Wikipedia:JSTOR/Approved/Round 2

Approved accounts - Round Two, July 2014
#Hi, I'm Jodosma. I'm a WikiGnome and I recently registered with Highbeam via Wikipedia. It is quite useful but JSTOR seems to offer more sources. I'm always looking to find new sources when I come across a dead link. With both JSTOR and Highbeam at my disposal I'm sure I can get rid of a lot more dead links. Jodosma (talk) 18:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Hello - I would be interested in being considered for JSTOR access. I often create and edit articles on fashion related topics, including designer articles and biographies, and am pretty active on the site generally. JSTOR seems as if it would be an extremely useful resource for the purposes of my work on the site. If I could be considered for the waiting list I'd be very grateful. Mabalu (talk) 15:27, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 2)  - I am an AfC-reviewer and a Wikignome who think access to JSTOR would be great, so that I may confirm added cites and sources. Feel free to contact me here, on my talk page or on IRC. Happy editing! (t)  Josve05a  (c) 15:04, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 3)  - The majority of my edits are related to a wide variety of medical topics, but I am currently unable to access the older papers of many medical journals published before the early 2000s. For non-subscribers, the archives of some journals appear to be only accessible via JSTOR.
 * Hey, I'm jxm. I'm particularly interested in helping to verify (or at least clarify) claims of scientific validity. Fringe theories like remote viewing are of particular concern. Tnx fr yr consideration. jxm (talk) 17:31, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  I don't have access to JSTOR at present. I was in need of it while writing many articles in wikipedia itself, especially the history related ones. Many material on the history of India, in which I am actively interested, belongs to the time when Indian was a British colony, like the Imperial gazetteers of India. And these material are only available through archives like JSTOR. I did get stuck many a times while creating articles like Nelcynda since the I wasn't able to access the relevant gazetteers and the like at JSTOR. I hope I meet all the requirements. Aravind V R (talk) 21:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Keen to join the waiting list for this access. I've been an editor since 2006 and have created over 200 articles with ~70 DYK credits, some of which are about scientific/medical topics where JSTOR journal access would be very useful. My work in this area has been limited by lack of access to non-free scientific publications and I'm keen to be more active. I have no current means of access. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:53, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Espresso Addict, I'm not seeing edits past March. Are you still looking for access/planning a return to article work? The Interior  (Talk) 14:28, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Back active at my main account now. I was using my subsidiary non-admin account after mislaying my password in a computer change. I'm still very interested in JSTOR access. As I mentioned, I've had difficulty writing scientific/medical articles because of lack of journal access and would plan to be more active in these areas if I were to have access. Espresso Addict (talk) 11:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * PS. Notifications doesn't appear to be enabled on this page; I didn't receive any notification of this rejection (I've just checked). Espresso Addict (talk) 11:41, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Bfpage  I am an active editor on Wikipedia.  I am a fairly new, new-page reviewer and have found that one of the struggles that new editors have is that they seem to find it difficult to find notable references on an article that they have created.  A lot of the newly created articles have great potential, but have to be tagged because they lack notable references, no references or only have one or two. Getting your first article tagged can be discouraging.  (It was for me and I had a while where I made no contributions because I was ‘bit’ so hard!) Many times I don’t simply review a new article, but I assist the new editor in locating relevant references. They then receive a positive review on their new article along with an encouraging note from me telling them that their new article has great potential. Because of my educational background and interests I am able to review some of the more technical, scientific, and medical articles. I am also trying to help with the Lepidoptera categories but find that a large percentage of information that I need is in journals. You will find that I don’t have the longest list of newly created articles because I am stalled in finding technical information related to Lepidoptera. I potentially could also expand and add references to other insect-related articles that are mostly stubs at this time. I am active on Special:NewPagesFeed specializing in reviewing the oldest articles that need reviewed.  My theory is that other reviewers may find it burdensome to help add technical references to a new article so they pass it on to someone else. I do not have free online access to JSTOR products through my local library.  My preferences are enabled to receive email messages on English Wikipedia.  I have an account that is more than one year old.  I have a total of 1,300 edits. I am active in content generation, adding references, establishing notability, and research.  I’ve even read the JSTOR Terms of Service.  I really would like to be the first positive message that a new editor gets telling them that I was able to add a few relevant references to their very first article. Thank you for considering my request to have access to JSTOR.bpage (talk) 01:25, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) AshLIn. 25,000 plus edits. Basically work in Biodiversity & Military History. Preferred activity is new articles, stubs and DYKs for which cutting edge refs are required. Located in India without access to JSTOR. Thanks in advance. AshLin (talk) 18:04, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Wilfridselsey (talk) 17:48, 5 August 2014 (UTC) I mainly edit Anglo-Saxon articles, a lot of them need bringing up to the required wiki standard. However, much of the source material is  in JSTOR and unfortunately I do not have access to it. Wilfridselsey (talk) 19:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) When researching articles, I have often been frustrated to find a tantalising JSTOR first page online but am unable to read further.  I am very active, mainly in the the area of classical music.  I have well over 100,000 edits and have initiated many hundreds of articles.  Thanks.  --   Jack of Oz   [pleasantries]  23:19, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) I am an editor at various Wikipedias including en but predominantly on Indic Wikis. Access to this library will be much useful to me as I am in constant search for authentic references and citations pertaining to history, science, biographies and Indo-European languages apart from other topics. Thank you. Viswa Prabha വിശ്വപ്രഭ  talk 00:03, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 6) Wifione Am active in AFDs and access to JSTOR would assist me in researching suitable references. Thanks. Wifione  Message 08:34, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 7) Thoughtfortheday. I am a reasonably active editor.  If I had access to JSTOR I would hope to create more new articles, particularly in the area of classical music. 08:47, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 8) User:Duffit5. I've worked mainly on articles of people associated with Norwich, UK going back to the 11th century. Access to JSTOR would be particularly useful for older biographical entries. Additionally there are several articles which I have been keen to access which would be of help to improve content about the history and linguistics of Norwich. Duffit  talk 13:19, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 9) User:Tutelary Often times, I mostly try to be a 'wikignome' so to speak, doing small things but I often read and look at articles relating to social sciences. Like, Feminism for example, and a lot of the sources are laid out in JSTOR which I cannot access. If given access, I would personally use it to mainly verify what the articles are justifying the source to use. However, having access may also give me a step in the right direction to primarily start writing content. Google's search for sourcing doesn't always come up with something, but there is usually always something reputable in a journal. Tutelary (talk) 15:40, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 10) User:David.cormier As a graduate student in history education I used JSTOR to flesh out or create articles for Wikipedia on figures from Colonial or Early Federal Period America. Since graduating, I've found a number of noteworthy figures of the Gilded Age who have no article, or their articles are sparse. I would like to create articles, but the open-source materials are often inaccurate, inconsistent or rife with POV. I seek access to peer-edited material, and so miss JSTOR!
 * 11) User:Laszlo Panaflex I've been very active over the last couple of years, particularly in the area of medieval history articles. Access to JSTOR would be very helpful to my research. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 16:39, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 12)  I am an active creator of content (641 new articles, 91 DYKs), especially biographies, and I have often come across articles I would like to use that JSTOR access would enable. Edwardx (talk) 19:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 13) User:Anupmehra - Hi, my Wikipedia user account is more than a year old, and it also more than 10,000 edits on English Wikipedia. I'd like to have free access to JSTOR, because it'd be helpful in multiple ways, as such, in saving notable articles from afd, improving articles running low on citations, and creating new articles, all in turn expanding horizons of encyclopedia. Thanks, Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  20:58, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 14) User:Hohenloh - I have been active on Wikipedia since June 2008, with over 14,000 edits and 325 new articles created. I would be very interested in using JSTOR for writing/improving articles on European history in particular. Hohenloh+ 22:23, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 15) Active since 2009. Varied areas of content work; particularly like environmental issues. Keri (talk) 22:59, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 16) User:Lfstevens - Hi. I have edited more than 10k articles. I am a member of the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. My substantive edits focus on batteries, materials science, genetic engineering, marine subjects and Hawaii. Many of these are poorly cited - JSTOR would be a big help. I have started 50+ articles on such subjects. Thanks!
 * 17)  - Editor since 2007, 7000 edits, 80% in articles. Active in areas of MidEast, I/P, early US history, European history, and development of water resource infrastructure.  Recently received Questia and BNA access through Wikipedia. But more recently my previous access through a VPN to JSTOR was lost; I previously used JSTOR extensively, and really miss it.  CasualObserver&#39;48 (talk) 06:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 18)  Consider me a low priority as I usually have access through uni, but I tend to lose access over summer when I haven't taught for a month or two.  Although I'm mostly a Wikignome/vandalfighter/copyeditor, I do look for errors (see here) and occasionally help review (eg). Contributor since '06. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 07:34, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 19)  Semi-regular content creator (25 good articles) primarily on popular music and geography, with occasional detours into other subjects. Access to print journals would help locating sources for pre 21st century material easily, particularly for mediaeval sources for WikiProject Kent articles like Gravesend - Tilbury Ferry or Faversham (Ashford, Kent was improved to GA principally through buying local history books). I am a working man who edits Wikipedia in his spare time and have no University access. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)  08:43, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 20) Donner60. I create new articles and add content and references to existing articles, mostly on history topics, especially Colonial Virginia, American Revolution and American Civil War. I have created 108 new pages, most of them on those history topics. I also patrol recent changes. I do not just revert vandalism. For some questionable edits, I add or check sources. I have a good military history home library and have used Questia. (High Beam is good for current references and newspapers but is of limited help.) I do not have journals at home and one can only have so many books of the thousands published on these subjects. I find Questia quite useful but not as comprehensive as needed for some topics. Donner60 (talk) 10:21, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 21) . I actively use Highbeam access to improve article content and verification, and I will use JSTOR access similarly. I will follow the recommended method for citing JSTOR refs. I will use JSTOR access responsibly, but my main content interest is popular music from 1900 on, where I suspect JSTOR will be of somewhat limited use. I suspect I will use it mainly in the context of general AfD's and other random purposes, so if there is any danger of WP bumping up against its max number of allocated accounts, please decline this request. Thanks --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 11:50, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 22) — I do a lot of content building and verifiable citation adding to articles on spaceflight, economics, history, and political econonmy; and sometimes, engineering topics more broadly including the history of technology.  I do not currently have access to JSTOR through any academic library.  I would use JSTOR access to improve articles, and to improve sources for existing articles.  I regularly use cite template citations, and will cite JSTOR articles in the recommended way.  Let me know if you need anything else from me to provide you with the application information you need.  Cheers.  N2e (talk) 14:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 23) - I edit a random collection of articles found while stub-sorting or otherwise, and create articles on miscellaneous topics too, and sometimes it would be useful to be able to access whole text rather than just an abstract page, to improve the article I'm working on - whether checking an existing ref or providing new ones. (My local public library, Lancashire, is listed as having JSTOR, but its website makes clear that it's only the 19th-century pamphlets collection.) I'm not sure I'll use it a lot, but if there are more places than applicants at present I could certainly make some use of it.  Pam  D  18:32, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 24) I'm a longstanding responsible editor with 13,000+ edits. I am active in creating and expanding articles about the arts.  JSTOR would be quite a useful tool for me.  Thanks very much.  --  Wikipedical (talk) 23:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 25) I've been editing since 2006, primarily in the areas of word and phrase origins and finance and investment.  The latter is both an area in which Wikipedia is not particularly strong, and one in which JSTOR resources would be quite useful.  I am also active on the Wikipedia Resource Exchange and regularly share resources there with other editors.  Although I have access to several other databases, I do not have access to JSTOR.  John M Baker (talk) 23:44, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 26) I've been an active editor for almost eight years, and have created or substantially rewritten a large number of articles on a variety of subjects.  Currently working principally on science and medicine, and expanding into biography; I don't have JSTOR access, and it would be extremely useful.  DoctorJoeE  review transgressions/talk to me!  03:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 27) I find myself creating and editing academic and writer articles. JSTOR information would be very useful. Best,  O ld B eeg  ··warble·· 03:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 28) I write a lot of scientific articles on earthquakes, volcanoes, and other geology-related subjects. Access to scientific journals would be incredibly helpful in research.  ceran  thor  03:58, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 29) I'm currently involved in a GLAM project with the Pritzker Military Museum & Library, and we seek to add in many new articles on military history topics with a particular emphasis on contributions made by artists, music, and women in this field.  The institution does indeed have access to ~100 academic journals, but articles cannot be accessed online, and this is by no means comprehensive when compared to something like JSTOR.  I, JethroBT drop me a line 07:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 30) I'm an active editor since early 2008 (more than 40,000 edits), admin since 2010. Access to JSTOR could help me to judge articles at WP:CSD and WP:AFD where I actively participate. Thank you for your consideration. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 11:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 31) I will find access to this database invaluable for my research and content creation work, particularly on natural history subjects. As I am neither currently enrolled at a university nor an academic, I do not have ready access to these journals. Access would enable me to greatly increase my capacity to create and expand natural history subject pages. Danimations (talk) 12:59, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 32) Would like to utilize the access to find citations for otherwise difficult to cite information in LGBT articles. --Varnent (talk)(COI) 16:46, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 33)  With nearly 6,000 edits since 2005, I've often used JSTOR but find their 3 article on the shelf limit rather awkward as many edits take quite a bit of research. So I'd love better access. Chris55 (talk) 19:16, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 34) Such a common occurrence: I am pursuing a very relevant reference for an article online only to find it is JSTOR and I cannot read the reference.  I write biographies and also musical history oriented articles. The article Mandore (instrument) is an example. JSTOR would help me by allowing me access to better quality references.Jacqke (talk) 19:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 35) I would use my JSTOR account to research climate change topics. My main interests are in general Earth sciences, and in particular climate science with a scope on paleoclimatology,paleoceanography and everything climatology. I created a few articles, such as Arctic sea ice decline, Antarctic sea ice, or climate state and did various contributions to articles, for instance polar amplification,Earth's energy budget and many more, see my contribution page. Thanks. prokaryotes (talk) 20:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 36) Editing WP since 2006.  One of my interests is applied arts.  JSTOR is a source of good secondary sources on the topics I write about.  I am not attached to a university and my public library does not subscribe to JSTOR.  Pelarmian (talk) 11:00, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 37)  I touch many fields in wikipedia: history, linguistics, dance, math, computer sci, geography, humour, folklore, antroponymy &mdash; out of indiscriminate curiosity. Usually I see something missing and try to expand using reliable sources, the way I've just did. Most of articles I created are about things far from mainstream interest, such as Rubber soldiers, Kannoneer_Jabůrek,  Swill milk, Čížečku, čížečku, Manta joke, Polyphony (Russian Orthodox liturgy), Traditional Sohbet meetings, Arrangement (space partition); you get the idea. Most of them stay basically in the form I created, not because I am that perfect writer, but mostly because nobody gives a damn. Therefore I start having a feeling that access to JSTOR will allow me to write better researched texts. -No.Altenmann >t 08:31, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 38)  - quite long-standing contributor with a couple of high-quality articles. Access would be helpful for creating more. The Land (talk)
 * 39)  - I haven't been as active lately, not coincidentally since I lost my university JSTOR access a couple of years ago. I used to be much more active, especially on medieval history articles (particularly dealing with the crusades), and I am still fairly active on the Reference Desk. In both cases it would be extremely helpful to have JSTOR access, and this would certainly allow me to start contributing much more actively again. Adam Bishop (talk) 11:51, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 40)  I edit mainly articles related to Africa (e.g., LGBT rights in Zambia, Languages of Lesotho, Sapo National Park), military and political figures (Nie Fengzhi, Marrack Goulding, René Olry, Rupert Thorneloe), academia and journalism (e.g., Kari Blackburn, Walter-Patrice O'Leary, Émile-Dostaler O'Leary), and the odd topic here and there (e.g., Endicott Pear Tree. The topics I write about often are not covered extensively by publicly available sources, and in the past I've often used university library resources to which I no longer have access. -- Black Falcon (talk) 19:16, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 41)  I've been mainly working on a module for over a year, and now want to do more serious content work, particularly at Female genital mutilation (which is planned for FA, see here) and its related articles. Johnuniq (talk) 11:13, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 42)  I'm admittedly not as active as of late, but I still do frequent the New Spain/Portuguese Empire related pages, and aim to get involved with the Catholic Church and the Age of Discovery page, including the Jesuits missions during the Early Modern period in Asia, Africa, and the Americas (or just active Catholic orders during that era) since I have access to articles related to them for now. I also work on articles related on Mimidae, in particular the Toxostoma. Access with JSTOR outside of the limited access I currently have could potentially be beneficial for me. LeftAire (talk) 20:55, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 43)  I write and edit articles on biogeography, botany, geography, history, and architecture. Access to JSTOR journals would help me create better articles.Tom Radulovich (talk) 04:33, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 44)  I'm a long-standing contributor who writes articles on American historic sites, and there have been a few times where I've wanted access to a JSTOR article that I didn't have access to, particularly those on obscure sites and lesser-known trends and people in American history. I currently have partial JSTOR access, but it doesn't include most of the history and archaeology journals that I'd want for my Wikipedia research. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 06:03, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 45) I have 720 edits as this user, but previously used the login User:Jonwurl which had 327 edits, so in principle I exceed the minimum edits.  I use articles of the JSTOR variety commonly as citation sources for my articles, which mainly are in the areas of history and technology. LaurentianShield (talk) 22:10, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 46) This would be very useful - I have often come up against the JSTOR paywall in researching. I have made 100,000 edits in seven years, and written hundreds of new articles. I am scaling back my editing now, but still have some new articles to write. StAnselm (talk) 00:32, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 47)  - I'm active on articles on communism, the institutionalisation of power, one-party systems and ideologies in general. JStor would give me access to sources to improve my work even further; for instance, i've been writing on the Workers' Party of Korea and the Communist Party of China articles (and related topics) recently. If I got access to JStor I could for instance access the article "Integrating Wealth and Power in China: The Communist Party's Embrace of the Private Sector" or "The Making of Chinese Intellectuals: Representations and Organization in the Thought Reform Campaign" (I want to improve articles on the CPC on topics such as ideology, organization, and propaganda) ... Or, for instance I'm interesting in learning (and working on) of the Kim dynasty (about the ruling family of North Korea) and the article "North Korea: From Dictatorship to Dynasty" would be of great help... I've made over 47,000 edits (over 31,000 main page edits) on Wikipedia, created 302 articles and I've been active since 2009. I have partial access to Jstor through the University of Oslo (but only history articles, not political science ones, and its those I want...) --TIAYN (talk) 12:32, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 48)  I chiefly work on articles relating to Ireland and have over 2,500 edits. I would use the archive to flesh out articles about Ireland. Bogger (talk) 08:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 49)  Until now I have made 15,000+ global contributions, predominantly on macroeconomics and economic history. I would use JSTOR access to expand articles, and to check sources. --Pass3456 (talk) 19:03, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 50)  I am an active user with focus in the Celtic nations broadly, including archeology, mythology, cultures, and history. Access to JSTOR would improve my ability to add appropriate citations to articles. Articles lacking or deficient in accurate citations are a particular personal peeve. I believe if I had access to JSTOR I would use it to significantly improve article sourcing in my editing. Pigman ☿/talk  22:55, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 51)  I have been a frequent editor in articles associated with Portugal and the Azores (its history, architecture and political developments). JSTOR access would permit improving citation and content development in this area: a section of Wikipedia that continues to be lacking good referenced content. ruben jc ZEORYMER (talk) 14:20, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 52)  I edit many different style articles as I have no limits on my desire for knowledge. I pay special attention to birds, geology and history. I am a meticulous citation user, and will vastly appreciate improved access to more sources. I also utilize access to media to verify and refine citations. speednat (talk) 05:04, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 53)  My article work is predominantly related to sports, so in that sense, JSTOR access might not be too helpful, but I also work in verification and AfD a fair amount, and it bothers the heck out of me when it looks like there might be something on JSTOR, but I can't quite tell ... also, as an admin, access would be helpful to investigate some disputes. So if we are running out of accounts and there are others who could use them more, feel free to distribute it to them first, but if we have extra accounts, having access might make my editing a tad easier. Either way, thanks.  Go   Phightins  !  18:08, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 54)  I am active in AfD, Afc and WP:ORPHANAGE and will use JSTOR to assess notability. I am active on technical and networking articles access to improve references in this area. ~KvnG 20:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 55) Shaibalahmar I have made about 1,900 edits (quality not quantity) on topics mainly related to the Middle East. It is a subject I regularly write about, on which I have created several new Wiki articles, so it would greatly help me to access JSTOR articles to ensure that Wikipedia remains objective and authoritative, thanks.Shaibalahmar (talk) 18:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 56) Reid,iain james I have made well over 5000 edits to wikipedia, mainly focusing on the topics of extinct organisms, geologic formations, mammals and birds. I have brought many articles to GA status, and quite a few of them use references available with a JSTOR subscription. Having access to JSTOR would allow me to verify, add and reference information, potentially improving hundreds of articles. Thanks, IJReid (talk) 02:14, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 57) FunkMonk I have written several featured and good articles about extinct animals, but often have to ask for sources at the resource request site. With this account, I would be able to get papers faster, be able to search or them, and thereby be more effective at writing more articles. FunkMonk (talk) 23:50, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 58)  I am an active contributor on Persian Wikipedia with nearly 29,0000 edits and over 400 new articles. I'm particularly interested in topics related to science and technology. If I had access to JSTOR I would use it for creating and expanding articles on Wikipedia and also in verifying information and sources. Dalba 04:49, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 59)  In content creation, I am active in mostly India related articles. Almost all the time, I use only online sources.  Indian newspapers usually do not have open archives before about 2000s. JSTOR resources may help me in writing about historical topics.-- Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ  02:55, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 60)  I have been an active Wikipedia member for nine years, about to hit 19,000 edits.JSTOR would be very helpful to me as I write articles on late 19th and early 20th century biography and architecture. Access to publications such as state historical society journals and architecture periodicals would allow me to enhance my articles with contemporary accounts. I was recently approved for the Newspapers.com and you can already see how I integrate these materials into my writings. I expect to do the same with JSTOR access. Teemu08 (talk) 20:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 61) I mostly edit topics related to India, Goa, Catholicism, and science. I hope to use JSTOR documents to improve the historical perspective of articles that I'm interested in. The Discoverer (talk) 12:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)