Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Mathematics/sandbox

This subpage of the Manual of Style contains guidelines for writing and editing clear, encyclopedic, attractive, and interesting articles on mathematics and for the use of mathematical notation in Wikipedia articles on other subjects. For matters of style not treated on this subpage, follow the main Manual of Style and its other subpages to achieve consistency of style throughout Wikipedia.

Content
The article should be pitched at its intended audience. . Featured article criteria demand that the article is well-written, well-referenced, complete, neutral and complies with the Manual of Style.

Articles within the focus of the Wikiproject Mathematics, and consequently addressed by the MOS extension, will discuss:
 * Mathematical theorems
 * Mathematical proofs
 * Mathematical applications
 * Biographies of mathematicians: Manual of Style/Biographies
 * Aspects of the history of mathematics

Article lead paragraph
The article should start with a short introductory section (often referred to as the lead). The purpose of this section is to describe, define, and give context to the subject of the article, to establish why it is interesting or useful, and to summarize the most important points. The lead should as far as possible be accessible to a general reader, so specialized terminology and symbols should be avoided as much as possible.

In general, the lead sentence should include the article title in bold along with alternative names, establish context by linking to a more general subject, and informally define or describe the subject.

The lead section should include, where appropriate:
 * Historical motivation: including names and dates, especially if the article does not have a separate History section. Explain the origin of the name if it is not self-evident.
 * Informal introduction: to the topic, without rigor, suitable for a general audience. (The appropriate audience for the overview will vary by article, but it should be as basic as reasonable.) The informal introduction should clearly state that it is informal, and that it is only stated to introduce the formal and correct approach. If a physical or geometric analogy or diagram will help, use one: many of the readers may be non-mathematical scientists.
 * Motivation: which can illuminate the use of the mathematical idea
 * Applications: and its connections to other areas of mathematics.

Article body
There is no right way to order the body text, when appropriate you may wish to include the following: "Let S and T be topological spaces, and let f be a function from S to T. Then f is called continuous if, for every open set O in T, the preimage f −1(O) is an open set in S."
 * Notation: If you want to introduce some notation, it should be in its own section. You should use standard notation where possible. If you need to use non-standard notations, or if you introduce new notations, you need to define, and it suggested that they are defined here.
 * Definition: There should be an exact definition, in mathematical terms; often in a Definition(s) section, for example:


 * Examples: Some representative examples would be nice to have, in a separate section, which could serve to both expand on the definition, and also provide some context as to why one might want to use the defined entity.
 * Generalizations (sic): Most mathematical ideas are amenable to some form of generalization. A Generalizations section. may be appropriate.

Concluding matters
Beneath this will be- Categories, and navigation templates and links to other Wikimedia projects.
 * See also: It is good to have a see also section, which connects to related Wikpedia pages which could provide more insight into the contents of the current article, but haven't already been linked.
 * References: A well-written and complete article must have a references section.
 * External links: Connects to other on-line resources, such as the original paper, and commentaries.

Writing style in mathematics
There are several issues of writing style that are particularly relevant in mathematical writing.


 * In the interest of clarity, sentences should not begin with a symbol. Here are some examples of what not to do:
 * Suppose that G is a group. G can be decomposed into cosets, as follows.
 * Let H be the corresponding subgroup of G. H is then finite.
 * Instead, one could write this:
 * A group G may be decomposed into cosets as follows.
 * Let H be the corresponding subgroup of G. Then H must be finite.

Writing pitfalls
A person editing a mathematics article should not fall into the temptation that "this formula says it all". A non-mathematical reader will skip the formulae in most cases, and often a mathematician reading outside her or his research area will do the same. Careful thought should be given to each formula included, and words should be used instead if possible. In particular, the English words "for all", "exists", and "in" should be preferred to the ∀, ∃, and ∈ symbols. Similarly, highlight definitions with words such as "is defined by" in the text.

If not included in the introductory paragraph, a section about the history of the concept is often useful and can provide additional insight and motivation.


 * Mathematics articles are often written in a conversational style, as if a lecture is being presented to the reader, and the article is taking the place of the lecturer's whiteboard. However, an article that "speaks" to the reader runs counter to the ideal encyclopedic tone of most Wikipedia articles. Article authors should avoid referring to "we" or addressing the reader directly. While opinions vary on how far this guideline should be taken in mathematics articles—an encyclopedic tone can make advanced mathematical topics more difficult to learn—authors should try to strike a balance between simply presenting facts and formulae, and relying too much on directing the reader or using such clichés as
 * "Note that…" / "It should be noted that…"
 * "It must be mentioned that…" / "It must be emphasized that…"
 * "Consider that…"
 * "We see that…"
 * and so on. Such introductory phrases are often unnecessary and can be omitted without affecting semantics. Rather than repeatedly attempting to draw the reader's attention to crucial pieces of information that have been appended almost as an afterthought, try to reorganize and rephrase the material such that crucial information comes first. There also should be no doubt as to the reader's willingness to continue reading and taking note of whatever information is presented; the reader does not need to be implored to take note of each thing being pointed out.


 * The articles should be accessible, as much as possible, to readers not already familiar with the subject matter. Notations that are not entirely standard should be properly introduced and explained. Whenever a variable or other symbol is defined in a formula, make sure that it is clear that this is a definition introducing a notation, and not, for example, just another equation. Also identify the nature of the entity being defined. So don't write this:
 * Multiplying M by u = v − v0, ...
 * Instead, write:
 * Multiplying M by the vector u defined by u = v − v0, ...
 * In definitions, the symbol "=" is preferred over "≡" or ":=".


 * When defining a term, do not use the phrase "if and only if". For example, instead of
 * A function f is even if and only if f(&minus;x) = f(x) for all x
 * write


 * A function f is even if f(&minus;x) = f(x) for all x.
 * If it is reasonable to do so, rephrase the sentence to avoid the use of the word "if" entirely. For example,
 * An even function is a function f such that f(&minus;x) = f(x) for all x.


 * Avoid, as far as possible, phrases such as
 * "It is easily seen that ..."
 * "Clearly ..."
 * "Obviously ..."
 * The reader might not find what you write obvious. This kind of statement does not add new information and thus detracts from the clarity of the article. Instead, it may be helpful to the reader if a hint is provided as to why something must hold, such as:


 * "It follows directly from this definition that ..."
 * "By a straightforward, if lengthy, algebraic calculation, ..."


 * When lecturing using a whiteboard, it is common to use abbreviations including wrt (with regard to) and wlog (without loss of generality), and to use quantifier symbols ∀ and ∃ instead of for all and there exists in prose. Some authors, including Paul Halmos, use the abbreviation iff for if and only if in print. On Wikipedia, all such abbreviations should be avoided. In addition to compromising the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia, these abbreviations are a form of jargon that may be unfamiliar to the reader.


 * The plural of formula is either formulae or formulas. Both are acceptable, but articles should be consistent with themselves. If an article is consistent, then editors should not change the article from one style to another.

Mathematical conventions
A number of conventions have been developed to make Wikipedia's mathematics articles more consistent with each other. These conventions cover choices of terminology, such as the definitions of compact and ring, as well as notation, such as the correct symbols to use for a subset.

These conventions are suggested in order to bring some uniformity between different articles, to aid a reader who moves from one article to another. However, each article may establish its own conventions. For example, an article on a specialized subject might be more clear if written using the conventions common in that area. Thus the act of changing an article from one set of conventions to another should not be undertaken lightly.

Natural numbers
The set of natural numbers has two common meanings: $\{0, 1, 2, 3, ...\}$, which may also be called non-negative integers, and $\{1, 2, 3, ...\}$, which may also be called positive integers. Use the sense appropriate to the field to which the subject of the article belongs if the field has a preferred convention. If the sense is unclear, and if it is important whether or not zero is included, consider using one of the alternative phrases rather than natural numbers if the context permits.

Algebra

 * A ring is assumed to be associative and unital. A structure satisfying all the ring axioms except the existence of a multiplicative identity is called a rng. There is an exception for rings of operators, such as * algebras, B* algebras, C* algebras, which we do not assume to be unital.
 * The ring with one element is called the zero ring.
 * A local ring is not assumed noetherian (contra Zariski).
 * For Clifford algebras use v2 = +Q(v).

Algebraic geometry

 * An algebraic variety is assumed to be an irreducible algebraic set.
 * A scheme (mathematics) is not assumed to be separated. The term "prescheme" is not used.

Topology

 * A compact space is not assumed to be Hausdorff (contra Bourbaki, who uses quasi-compact for our notion of compactness).
 * Separation axioms for topological spaces are as described on the separation axiom page.

Miscellaneous

 * Directed sets are preordered sets with finite joins, not partial orders as in, e.g., Kelley (General Topology; ISBN 0-387-90125-6).
 * A lattice need not be bounded. In a bounded lattice, 0 and 1 are allowed to be equal.
 * Elliptic functions are written in ω = half-period style.
 * A weight k modular form follows the Serre convention that f(−1/τ) = τkf(τ), and q = e2πiτ.

Notational conventions

 * The abstract cyclic group of order n, when written additively, has notation Zn, or in contexts where there may be confusion with p-adic integers, Z/nZ; when written multiplicatively, e.g. as roots of unity, Cn is used (this does not affect the notation of isometry groups called Cn).
 * The standard notation for the abstract dihedral group of order 2n is Dn in geometry and D2n in finite group theory. There is no good way to reconcile these two conventions, so articles using them should make clear which they are using.
 * Bernoulli numbers are denoted by Bn, and are zero for n odd and greater than 1.
 * In category theory, write Hom-sets, or morphisms from A to B, as Hom(A,B) rather than Mor(A,B) (and with the implied convention that the category is not a small category unless that is said).
 * The semidirect product of groups K and Q should be written K ×φ Q or Q ×φ K where K is the normal subgroup and φ : Q → Aut(K) is the homomorphism defining the product. The semidirect product may also be written K ⋊ Q or Q ⋉ K (with the bar on the side of the non-normal subgroup) with or without the φ.
 * The context should clearly state that this is a semidirect product and should state which group is normal.
 * The bar notation is discouraged because it is not supported by all browsers.
 * If the bar notation is used it should be entered as (⋉) or  (⋊) for maximum portability.
 * Subset is denoted by $$\subseteq$$, proper subset by $$\subsetneq$$. The symbol $$\subset$$ may be used if the meaning is clear from context, or if it is not important whether it is interpreted as subset or as proper subset (for example, $$A\subset B$$ might be given as the hypothesis of a theorem whose conclusion is obviously true in the case that $$A=B$$). All other uses of the $$\subset$$ symbol should be explicitly explained in the text.
 * For a matrix transpose, use superscript non-italic capital letter T: XT, $$X^\mathrm T$$ or $$X^\mathsf T$$, and not XT, $$X^T$$, or $$X^\top$$.
 * In a lattice, infima are written as a ∧ b or as a product ab, suprema as a ∨ b or as a sum a + b. In a pure lattice theoretical context the first notation is used, usually without any precedence rules. In a pure engineering or "ideals in a ring" context the second notation is used and multiplication has higher precedence than addition. In any other context the confusion of readers of all backgrounds should be minimized. In an abstract bounded lattice, the smallest and greatest elements are denoted by 0 and 1.
 * The scalar or dot product of vectors should be denoted with a centre-dot a ⋅ b, as an inner product $\langlea,b\rangle$ or (a,b), or as a matrix product aTb, never with juxtaposition ab.

Typesetting of mathematical formulae
One may set formulae using LaTeX (the tag, described in the next subsection) or, in certain cases, using other means of formatting that render in HTML; both are acceptable and widely used, though there are issues, as discussed below. However, for section headings, use HTML only, as LaTeX markup does not appear in the table of contents.

Large scale formatting changes to an article or group of articles are likely to be controversial. One should not change formatting boldly from LaTeX to HTML, nor from non-LaTeX to LaTeX without a clear improvement. Proposed changes should generally be discussed on the talk page of the article before implementation. If there will be no positive response, or if planned changes affect more than one article, consider notifying an appropriate Wikiproject, such as WP:WikiProject Mathematics for mathematical articles.

For in-line formulae, such as $a^{2} − b^{2}$, the community of mathematical editors of English Wikipedia currently has no consensus about preferred formatting; see WP:«math» for details.

Though, for a formula on its own line the preferred formatting is the LaTeX markup, with a possible exception for simple strings of Latin letters, digits, common punctuation marks, and arithmetical operators. Even for simple formulae the LaTeX markup might be preferred if required for the uniformity through an article.

Using LaTeX markup
Wikipedia allows editors to typeset mathematical formulae in (a subset of) LaTeX markup (see also TeX); the formulae are, for a default reader, translated into PNG images. They may also be rendered as MathML, which is part of HTML5, depending on user preferences and the nature of the browser being used. Care must be taken to avoid markup that is known to render differently under the different systems. The LaTeX formulae can be displayed in-line (like this: $$\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{R}^2$$), as well as on their own line:


 * $$\int_0^\infty e^{-x^2}\,dx.$$

When displaying formulae on their own line, one should indent the line with one or more colons ; the above was typeset from

If you find an article which indents lines with spaces in order to achieve some formula layout effect, you should convert the formula to LaTeX markup.

Having LaTeX-based formulae in-line has the following drawbacks, if they are displayed using the default PNG images:
 * The font size is larger than that of the surrounding text on some browsers, making text containing in-line formulae hard to read.
 * Misalignment can result. For example, instead of ex, with "e" at the same level as the surrounding text and the x in superscript, one may see the e lowered to put the vertical center of the whole "ex" at the same level as the center of the surrounding text.
 * The download speed of a page is negatively affected if it contains many formulae.
 * Copy-pasting of the inline mathematics images that are generated by LaTex markup will not work if the application into which you are pasting only accepts text.

If an in-line formula needs to be typeset in LaTeX, often better formatting can be achieved by setting the display attribute to inline. By default, LaTeX code is rendered as if it were a displayed equation (not in-line), and this can frequently be too big. For example, the formula, which displays as $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty 1/n^2 = \pi^2/6$$, is too large to be used in-line. generates a smaller summation sign and moves the limits on the sum to the right side of the summation sign. The code for this is, and it renders as the much more aesthetic $\sum_{n=1}^\infty 1/n^2 = \pi^2/6$. However, the default font for inline formula is different from the normal text font. Consequently the formula might appear larger or smaller than the surrounding text on many browsers.

HTML-generating formatting, as described above, is adequate for most simple in-line formulae and better for text-only browsers.

Deprecated formatting
Older versions of the MediaWiki software supported displaying simple LaTeX formulae as HTML rather than as an image. Although this is no longer an option, some formulae have formatting in them intended to force them to display as an image, such as an invisible quarter space added at the end of the formula, or   at the beginning. Such formatting can be removed if a formula is edited and need not be added to new formulae.

Alt text
Images generated from LaTeX markup have alt text, which is displayed to visually impaired readers and other readers who cannot see the images. The default alt text is the LaTeX markup that produced the image. You can override this by explicitly specifying an  attribute for the   element. For example,  generates an image \sqrt{\pi} whose alt text is "Square root of pi". Small and easily explained formulas used in less technical articles can benefit from explicitly specified alt text. More complicated formulas, or formulas used in more technical articles, are often better off with the default alt text.

Using HTML
The following sections cover the way of presenting simple in-line formulae in HTML, instead of using LaTeX.

Templates supporting HTML formatting are listed in Category:Mathematical formatting templates. Not all however are recommended for use, in particular use of the frac template to format fractions is discouraged in mathematics articles.

Font formatting

 * The relationship is defined as.

will result in:


 * The relationship is defined as x = (y2 + 2).

As TeX uses a serif font to display a formula (both as PNG and HTML), you may use the template to display your HTML formula in serif as well. Doing so will also ensure that the text within a formula will not line-wrap, and that the font size will closely match the surrounding text in any skin.


 * The relationship is defined as.

will result in:


 * The relationship is defined as $x = (y^{2} + 2)$.

Variables
To start with, we generally use italic text for variables, but never for numbers or symbols. You can use  in the edit box to refer to the variable x. Some prefer using the HTML "variable" tag,, since it provides semantic meaning to the text contained within. Others use the mvar template to show single variables is a serif typeface, to help distinguish certain characters such as $I$ and $l$. Which method you choose is entirely up to you, but in order to keep with convention, we recommend the wiki markup method of enclosing the variable name between repeated apostrophe marks. Thus we write:



which results in:


 * x = (y2 + 2).

While italicizing variables, things like parentheses, digits, equal and plus signs should be kept outside of the double-apostrophed sections. In particular, do not use double apostrophes as if they are  tags; they merely denote italics. Descriptive subscripts should not be in italics, because they are not variables. For example, mfoo is the mass of a foo. SI units are never italicized: x = 5 cm.

Functions
Names for standard functions, such as sin and cos, are not in italic font, but we use italic names such as f for functions in other cases; for example when we define the function as in f(x) = sin(x) cos(x).

Sets
Sets are usually written in upper case italics; for example:


 * A = {x : x > 0}

would be written:



Greek letters
Italicize lower-case Greek letters when they are variables (in line with the general advice to italicize variables): the example expression λ + y = πr2 would then be typeset as. However consistency with TeX or LaTeX style would not italicize capital Greek letters.

Common sets of numbers
Commonly used sets of numbers are typeset in boldface, as in the set of real numbers R; coded as. See blackboard bold for the types in use. Again, typically we use wiki markup: three apostrophes rather than the HTML   tag for making text bold.

Superscripts and subscripts
Subscripts and superscripts should be wrapped in  and   tags, respectively, with no other formatting info. Font sizes and such should be entrusted to be handled with stylesheets. For example, to write c3+5, use



Do not use special characters like ² for squares. This does not combine well with other powers, as the following comparison shows:


 * 1 + x + x² + x3 + x4 (with ) versus
 * 1 + x + x2 + x3 + x4 (with ).

Moreover, the TeX engine used on Wikipedia may format simple superscripts using  depending on user preferences. Thus, instead of the image $$x^2\,$$, many users see x2. Formulae formatted without using TeX should use the same syntax to maintain the same appearance.

Special symbols
There are list of mathematical symbols, list of mathematical symbols by subject and a list at Mathematical symbols that may be useful when editing mathematics articles. Almost all mathematical operator symbols have their specific code points in Unicode outside both ASCII and General Punctuation (with notable exception of "+", "=", "|", as well as ",", ":", and three sorts of brackets). As a rule of thumb, specific mathematical symbols shall be used, not similarly looking ASCII or punctuation symbols, even if corresponding glyphs are indistinguishable. The list of mathematical symbols by subject includes markup for LaTeX and HTML, and Unicode code points.

There are two caveats to keep in mind, however.
 * 1) Not all of the symbols in these lists are displayed correctly on all browsers (see Help:Special characters). Although the symbols that correspond to named entities are very likely to be displayed correctly, a significant number of viewers will have problems seeing all the characters listed at Unicode Mathematical Operators. One way to guarantee that an uncommon symbol is rendered correctly for all readers is to force the symbol to display as an image, using the &lt;math> environment.
 * 2) Not all readers will be familiar with mathematical notation. Thus, to maximize the size of the audience who can read an article, it is better to be conservative in using symbols. For example, writing "a divides b" rather than "a" in an elementary article may make it more accessible.

Less-than sign
Although the MediaWiki markup engine is fairly smart about differentiating between unescaped "&lt;" characters that are used to denote the start of an embedded HTML or HTML-like tag and those that are just being used as literal less-than symbols, it is ideal to use  when writing the less-than sign, just like in HTML and XML. For example, to write x &lt; 3, use



not

Multiplication sign
Standard algebraic notation is best for formulae, so two variables q and d being multiplied are best written as qd when presented in a formula. That is, when citing a formula, don't use.

However, when explaining the formula for a general audience (not just mathematicians), or giving examples of its application, it is prudent to use the multiplication sign: "×", coded as  in HTML. Do not use the letter "x" to indicate multiplication. For example:


 * When dividing 26 by 4, 6 is the quotient and 2 is the remainder, because 26 = 6 × 4 + 2.
 * −42 = 9 × (−5) + 3

An alternative to the  markup is the dot operator   (also encoded   and reachable in the "Math and logic" drop-down list below the edit box), which produces a properly spaced centered dot: "a &sdot; b".

Do not use the ASCII asterisk (*) as a multiplication sign outside of source code. It is not used for this purpose in professionally published mathematics, and most fonts render it in an inappropriate vertical position (above the midline of the text rather than centered on it). For the dot operator, do not use punctuation symbols, such as a simple interpunct  (the choice offered in the "Wiki markup" drop-down list below the edit box), as in many fonts it does not kern properly.

The use of as an operator symbol is also discouraged except in abstract contexts (e.g. to denote an unspecified operator).

Minus sign
The correct encoding of the minus sign "−" is different from all varieties of hyphen "-‐‑", as well as from en-dash "–". To really get a minus sign, use the "minus" character "−" (reachable via selecting "Math and logic" in the drop-down list below the edit box), or use the " " entity.

Square brackets
Square brackets have two problems; they can occasionally cause problems with wiki markup, and editors sometimes 'fix' the brackets in asymmetrical intervals to make them symmetrical. A general solution to problems like this is to use the nowiki tag as in for example  to show ] is special.

The use of intervals for the range or domain of a function is very common. A solution which makes the reason for the different brackets around an interval more plain is to use one of the templates open-closed, closed-open, open-open, closed-closed. For instance:



produces



These templates use the math template to avoid line breaks and use the TeX font.

Function symbol
There is a special Unicode function symbol for functions, U+0192, "LATIN SMALL LETTER F WITH HOOK = script f = Florin currency symbol (Netherlands) = function symbol", which looks like ƒ. As of December 2010, this character is not interpreted correctly by screen readers such as JAWS and NonVisual Desktop Access. An italicized letter f should be used instead.

Explanation of symbols in formulae
Short lists of coefficients and variables should be written in prose, while, for more complex situations list format should be used. For example: The force is given by
 * $$\mathbf{F} = \mathbf{m} \times \mathbf{a},$$

where b is Force, m is the mass, and a is the acceleration.✅ The following is deprecated: The force is given by
 * $$\mathbf{F} = \mathbf{m} \times \mathbf{a},$$

where Longer definitions (such as in Heat equation), can be in list format. However each definition should end with a comma or semicolon, and the last one should end with a period if it terminates a sentence.
 * F is the force,
 * m´ is the mass,
 * a is the acceleration.

Punctuation after formulae
Just as in mathematics publications, a sentence which ends with a formula must have a period at the end of the formula. This equally applies to displayed formulae (that is, formulae that take up a line by themselves). Similarly, if the conventional punctuation rules would require a question mark, comma, semicolon, or other punctuation at that place, the formula must have that punctuation at the end.

If the formula is written in LaTeX, that is, surrounded by the  and   tags, then the punctuation needs to also be inside the tags to stop it being wrapped to a newline. This method can be unaesthetic in formulas wherethe baseline does not line up with that of the running text. In this case the formula can be enclosed using the nowrap template, as in.

Preferred type styles
In mathematics notation, functions that have multi-letter names should always be in an upright font. The most well-known functions—trigonometric functions, logarithms, etc.—are often written without parentheses. For example:

When operator (function) names do not have a pre-defined abbreviation, we may use   to give correct spacing. The alternative method using other means of markup such as  is not recommended:

Special care is needed with subscripted labels to distinguish the purpose of the subscript (as this is a common error): variables and constants in subscripts should be italic, while textual labels should be in normal text font (Roman, upright). For example:


 * See An opinion: Why you should never use \mbox within Wikipedia.

On the other hand, for the differential, imaginary unit, and Euler's number, Wikipedia articles usually use an italic font, so one writes

Some authors prefer to use an upright (Roman) font for dx, and Roman boldface for i. Both forms are correct; what is most important is consistency within an article. It is considered inappropriate for an editor to go through articles doing mass changes from one style to another. This is much the same principle as the guidelines in the Manual of Style for the colour/color spelling choice, etc.

Certain objects, such as the real numbers R, are traditionally printed in boldface, or a double-struck font such as Blackboard Bold. Though both are acceptable, bolding is preferred as some browsers do not support the Unicode symbols, which lie outside the Basic Multilingual Plane. As with all such choices, the article should be consistent. Editors should not change articles from one choice of typeface to another.
 * Blackboard bold

Fractions
In mathematics articles, fractions should always be written either with a horizontal fraction bar (as in $$\textstyle\frac{1}{2} $$ ), or with a forward slash and with the baseline of the numbers aligned with the baseline of the surrounding text (as in 1/2).✅ The use of frac (such as $(−π, π]$  ) is discouraged. The use of Unicode symbols (such as ½) is discouraged entirely, for accessibility reasons among others. Metric dimensions are given in decimal notation (e.g., 5.2 cm); non-metric units can be either type of fraction, but the fraction style should be consistent throughout the article.

Proofs
This is an encyclopedia, not a collection of mathematical texts; but we often want to include proofs, as a way of really exposing the meaning of some theorem, definition, etc. A downside of including proofs is that they may interrupt the flow of the article, whose goal is usually expository. Use your judgement; as a rule of thumb, include proofs when they expose or illuminate the concept or idea; don't include them when they serve only to establish the correctness of a result.

Since many readers will want to skip proofs, it is a good idea to set them apart in some way, for instance by giving them a separate section. Additional discussion and guidelines can be found at WikiProject Mathematics/Proofs.

Algorithms
An article about an algorithm may include pseudocode or in some cases source code in some programming language. Wikipedia does not have a standard programming language or languages, and not all readers will understand any particular language even if the language is well-known and easy to read, so consider whether the algorithm could be expressed in some other way. If source code is used always choose a programming language that expresses the algorithm as clearly as possible.

Articles should not include multiple implementations of the same algorithm in different programming languages unless there is encyclopedic interest in each implementation.

Source code should always use syntax highlighting. For example this markup:

generates the following:

Graphs and diagrams


There is no general agreement on what fonts to use in graphs and diagrams. In geometrical diagrams points are normally labelled using upper case letters, sides with lower case and angles with lower case Greek letters. Use of a italic serif font is recommendeded but not mandated.

For ease of reference diagrams and graphs should use the same conventions as the text that the illustrate. When there is a better illustration using a different convention, though, the better illustration is preferred.

Help for those writing a formula

 * Help:Displaying a formula (TEX and LaTEX)
 * Mathematical symbols (HTML)
 * Rendering math (essay)

General information

 * WikiProject Mathematics
 * Scientific citation guidelines (guideline on providing references for mathematical and scientific articles)
 * Unicode blocks (guidelines on implemented unicode characters)