Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2005-12-25 image deletion

Initial request

 * Request made by: KittenKlub 22:23, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

On my talk page User_talk:KittenKlub
 * Where is the issue taking place?


 * Who's involved?
 * User:KittenKlub
 * User:Sandertje


 * What's going on?

On December 20, I nominated an image for deletion because I doubted the public domain claim. The user replied, and the next day, he removed the nomination, so I issued him with a warning and told him not to remove it again. He removed this from his talk page twice, and issued me with a warning today.


 * ''What would you like to change about that?


 * He wants to take revenge in one way or another. I'd like the warning deleted from my page and a moderator to tell him to behave, because up to now he just took revenge.


 * If you'd prefer we work discreetly, how can we reach you?

Mediator response
Investigating the issue, will post findings here shortly. Rob Church Talk 21:11, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Both users contacted, will proceed when I've feedback from them both. Rob Church Talk 21:30, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Mediation closed
Since this is nothing but nonsense because it seems like it just a position to gratify to ego of so called mediators who do nothing at all when handed a request. KittenKlub 23:55, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Rob Church is hereby dismissed as not qualifying for his position. KittenKlub 23:57, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Mediation reopened
Kittenklub wanted to solve a problem, and issued a mediation.Now that it's not working out the way he planned, he'closes it' as if he's got that right in the first place.

This conflict is far from over and I would like to ask RobChurch to stick around and keep up the good work!

Sandertje 17:07, 12 January 2006 (UTC)