Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-01-18 Feminem.com

Request Information

 * Request made by: Kingdoms united 2004 04:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Where is the issue taking place?
 * ...The Feminem.com talk page


 * Who's involved?
 * ...InShaneee


 * What's going on?
 * ...Myself and InShaneee gotten into a dispute over an article he considers to violate the NPOV policy. Brad V. got involved, flamed and got banned from editing for however long. I would like to do my best to improve the related article, but when I asked InShaneee what violated the NPOV rule, he keeps blanking out my questions. I also now realise I violated the 3 revert rule in which I kind of got caught up in the moment with. :(


 * ''What would you like to change about that?
 * ...I would like to know why he voted the feminem.com article as a violation of the NPOV rule. And thereon better it


 * If you'd prefer we work discreetly, how can we reach you?
 * ...I'd rather be more bothered about why InShaneee is bearing his teeth rather than posting constructive criticism.

Comments by others
Hi -- you may want to wait for a bit until the AfD on the article is finished. My feeling is that it will probably be deleted because it (IMO) does not satisfy WP:WEB; since I've voted on the AfD I probably shouldn't be the mediator, but presumably someone will volunteer if the article survives the AfD discussion (should be done in a few days.) Sdedeo (tips) 04:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Which is why I wanted to know what was wrong with the article in the first place. A lot of work went into creating it, and it would be a shame to see it vanish in a puff of smoke because it doesn't conform to the policies.--Kingdoms united 2004 04:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Mediator response
Note left on talk page to the effect that the mediation will be closed until conclusion of the AfD. - FrancisTyers 19:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

OK, the article was deleted, so I'll close this out. Sdedeo (tips) 05:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC)