Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-09-13 Keith Locke

Mediation Case: 2006-09-13 Keith Locke
Please observe Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.

Request Information

 * Request made by: Drstuey 10:16, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Drstuey
 * Where is the issue taking place?
 * Keith Locke 1st para


 * Who's involved?
 * Drstuey and User:Armon


 * What's going on?
 * We can't agree on the format of the 1st para of the Controversy section. We each think the other's wording is PoV. We have reverted each others wording repeatedly. Armon is particularly agressive in his edits, often doing a complete revert back to a old version he likes and consequently deleting other non-controversial edits. We have also had a dispute about 2 other parts of the page, but have managed to reach some concensus about them. I have tried to involve other editors to help us reach concensus, but nothing yet and the revert war looks like continuing with neither of us backing down.


 * ''What would you like to change about that?
 * I'd like Armon to be a bit more understanding of others viewpoints and to assume good faith, I'd like him to personally attack me less. I'd like myself to manage to assume good faith, stay cool and avoid personal attacks.


 * Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
 * No, public is fine.

Mediator response
I'll take this case. I'm opening discussion on the talk page of the article and informing all parties involved.  Canadian - Bacon  t  c   e 16:02, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Closing. --Ideogram 08:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Compromise offers
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.