Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-10-27 Ashanti Confederacy

Mediation Case: 2006-10-27 Ashanti Confederacy
Please observe Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.

Request Information

 * Request made by: Blambloom 21:09, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Blambloom
 * Where is the issue taking place?
 * ...the article ashanti confederacy is not completely accurate. I'm trying to redirect the article into a much more thorough article about the Ashanti People called The Ashanti for lack of a better name right now, but everytime I do, the article is reverted back to its old incomplete and a bit inaccurate form.


 * Who's involved?
 * ...Rusty2005


 * What's going on?
 * ...Rusty wrote the government portion of Ashanti Confederacy and thinks its being deleted. He won't even read The Ashanti and see that his poorly done Government section is still there. not deleted.


 * ''What would you like to change about that?
 * ... I'd like it redirected to The Ashanti and all articles about the Ashanti Confederacy changed to The Ashanti


 * Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
 * ...No, I've tried messaging Rusty and he will not respond. In fact, I think I've been blocked from Ashanti Confederacy article.

Mediator response
I will mediate. Have you come to a resolution? G e o. 19:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Compromise offers
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.


 * Since this request was posted, I've been in touch with said editor to discuss the changes and have suggested we work together (I did so before noticing this request had been posted). This request was posted before the editor got in touch with me. We will hopefully soon be corresponding in a friendly manner. I wish to state that my Government section is not "poorly done", far from it. And I haven't blocked anyone, I don't have the power to do that. Rusty2005 23:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Closing Statement
The initiator's talk page shows that the users have resolved the issue. I therefore 'close the case and remand to the archives G e o. 01:50, 4 November 2006 (UTC)