Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-10-28 link dispute

Mediation Case: 2006-10-28 link dispute
Please observe Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.

Request Information

 * Request made by: UK 02:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Where is the issue taking place?
 * Talk:Nothing


 * Who's involved?
 * Omicronpersei8, Jim Douglas, Uberkuh


 * What's going on?
 * potentially unwarranted removal of link; possible personal attack


 * ''What would you like to change about that?
 * Author objects that articles should not linked on the basis of media type. Requests reinsertion.


 * Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
 * Given the nature of the website containing the link in question, I request as much help as possible. This dispute is small but discussion ensuing from it suggests a significantly larger issue at hand. Thank you for considering this request.--UK 02:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Mediator response
I'll take this as my first case. It seems a rather straightforward miscommunication. CaveatLectorTalk 05:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Compromise offers
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.