Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-25 Dalit Freedom Network

Mediation Case: 2206-11-25 Dalit Freedom Network
Please observe Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.

Request Information

 * Request made by: Hclintontx 17:22, 24 November 2006 (UTC)hclintontx


 * Where is the issue taking place?
 * ...dalit freedom netwoek


 * Who's involved?
 * ...chick bowen, hkelkar, and others


 * What's going on?
 * ...Dalit Freedom is a US 501(c)(3) with plenty of public info out there, supportingby many us citizens. The above editors and administrators are continually, for a political purpose, putting untrue and inflammatory materialson the site . They have no connection to DFN.They delete all changes to correct the information and even delete user talk discussing the problem. In teh legal world what they are doing is not only vandalim and a "point-of-view"

violation but also slander.


 * ''What would you like to change about that?
 * ...how can info be posted and permanently protected about DFN that is trus and accurate and not from a protestoers point of view?


 * Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
 * ...Yesbecasue we have already received threatening communications from some of these and even the admistrator usesa RELIGIOUS symbol of a satanic star over the flag of India as a symbol!! Talk about a onesided point of view!!!!

Comment by Addhoc: Not sure about your satanic star comment, my understanding is the DFN has good relations with many non-Christians...

Compromise offers
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.



Discussion
In the context of recent changes to the article, is mediation still required? If so, could you outline how the article should be improved... Addhoc 15:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Should I close the case... Addhoc 11:52, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll close the case for now... Addhoc 12:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC)