Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-09-19 Very minimum-shift keying

Who are the involved parties?
Investintech (that is myself) and a party by the name of Oli Filth

What's going on?
We are debating the validity of a technology, VMSK. You can read the lengthy messages back and forth. There has not been particularly rude or unruly behavior until recently when Mr. Filth decided to delete certain facts about a similar technology that the inventor of VMSK has consulted on in the past. The current apparent "success track" of THAT technology appears to validate at least some of his thinking on VMSK. He has been granted patents for VMSK and numerous other technologies. It is ridiculous, in my opinion, that Mr. Filth continues to delete thousands of words on the discussion page!. I have actually granted him and others the main VMSK page, which in my mind, is written with great prejudice by a couple of engineers who are in strong opposition to the "workability" of the technology. Yet, the technology has been assessed by a number of third parties to date, including the reknowned Dr. Lee (mentioned on the discussion page), who clearly favors the technology. He is a leader, if not THE leader in the field of RF technologies, and his work is more advanced than those who would disparage VMSK here. In closing, I would think the discussion page is exactly the right place for genuine "back and forth", and not a place for "opponents" to be deleting current news regarding the inventor's work with any other company.

What would you like to change about that?
I think all appropriate notes should be maintained for the readership.

Administrative notes
Closing this request, requester has been indefinitely blocked for disruptive behavior and appears to be a single purpose account. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 20:57, 19 September 2007 (UTC)