Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-10-24 Ray Comfort

Who are the involved parties?
User:Homestarmy User:SSobregon88 User:Nascentatheist User:65.254.54.98 User:Kyndcat

What's going on?
A link to a website offering information critical of the subject of this Wikipedia article was added to the article, but the link was removed because other editors do not want readers to be aware of this critical information. The link was reattached to the article, but was again removed, and an edit war has ensued.

What would you like to change about that?
We would like the links offering both positive and negative views of the subject of the article to remain listed on the article, and we want the whitewashing to stop. Please email us with any questions about this.

Mediator notes
The critical website appears to be http://www.wotmwatchdog.org

The problem with using this link appears to relate to low quality, as opposed to censorship of the views. There doesn't appear from a google search to be anything resembling a detailed, well written article that could be used for an external link. Addhoc 14:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Administrative notes
I'd say someone should ask User:Doc glasgow if that link would be in violation of WP:BLP. If it is case closed. If not then a mediator will have to step up and work things how. (I say him since he's pretty much the main BLP handler) Wizardman  19:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure you understand - the case is virtually closed at the moment - the linked article is of low quality. Addhoc 18:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean. After checking the link it's quite clear that it's low quality and not needed. I'll let you finish up mediation then since this case seems very clear cut. Wizardman  19:52, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Addhoc 22:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)