Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-03-08 David Hicks

Who are the involved parties?
SmithBlue, Prester John and Skyring

What's going on?
Prester John edited 3 times to include material that was not verifiable in the references supplied. Prester John defended these edits as being allowed by WP:WEIGHT and promoted a view of the removals of his edits as "disruptive behaviour". Skyring promoted a view of the removal of Prester John's edits as "edit warring".

What would you like to change about that?
I would like a consensus view to form on how Prester John's edits relate to WP policies, and a consensus to form on the promotion of the view, by Skyring and Prester John, that WP:WEIGHT was more important that WP:OR and WP:BLP in this matter.