Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-12/Chad Dukes (radio personality)

Where's the dispute?
On the Discussion page of Chad Dukes (radio personality) page

What's the dispute?
Editor named NeutralHomer reverts my comments and claims vandalism, which is not true.

Today (12/24/2008)I saw that at 5:30 am 12/22/2008 NeutralHomer removed the ENTIRE discussion from the Discussion page, including the following:

"Don't jump to delete. You waited, what, 30 seconds before tagging the stub for deletion? I was still working out the disambiguation during that half-minute. Allow me to continue with the article before considering for deletion. Thank you! --Tischlerpaul 16:11, 2 October 2007 (UTC)"

which was posted by someone other than me. This NeutralHomer fellow is out of control. Please fix.

Comments from mediator
Hi there. After reading the relevant pages, in particular, the ANI thread, and the relevant talk page thread, I'm not sure mediation is necessary. What appears to have happened was a misunderstanding. NeutralHomer reverted your additions to the talk page as vandalism, but you contested this, claiming that it wasn't vandalism. The general consensus at ANI was that the content was inappropriate per WP:TALK, which was explained to you. NeutralHomer extended the hand of good faith on your talk page, which I believe you accepted. As NeutralHomer has made it clear that he wants nothing further to do with it, mediation in itself will not suit you. I therefore suggest that you heed the advice given to you, and continue to contribute to Wikipedia in a constructive manner. Remember to ask if you require assistance, and good luck. Best, Peter Symonds ( talk ) 00:50, 30 December 2008 (UTC)