Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-01/Cerejota and Brewcrewer

Where's the dispute?
User Talk:Brewcrewer, User Talk:Cerejota, Roof knocking (and talk and AfD), and to a lesser extent 2008-2009 Israel-Gaza conflict (and talk, including sub-talk pages for Lead and Title)

What's the dispute?
User:Brewcrewer seems focused on my behavior, going as far to request a block for 3RR, which was described as lame by the blocking admin and quickly reversed (I had indeed, in good faith, done 3RR). In spite of multiple requests to tone down his personal comments (including what I percieved as hostility - which he calls "uncivil") he has insisted I am being uncivil towards other editors (the other editors seem silent on the matter) and unproductive in general (for wich I disagree strongly). I disagree with his view, but I am willing to hear from uninvolved parties otherwise. I will accept my responsibility (if any), but I will not accept what I see as continued harrasment in order to intimidate me as an editor.

I have also asked him to pursue other avenues of dispute resolution, as his arguments do not seem compeling to me. As we are in editing disagreements, it is hard for me to view this as neutral attempts to pursue respect for policy. I am all for civil enviroments, even wrote an essay on this topic: WP:UCEPE.

I am in particular worried about WP:OWN issues around Roof knocking - which I have not raised but his behavior seems to indicate a connection from my point of view: they escalated when that article was started. Other editors in disagreements have so far managed to concentrate on content. In view of this, and before things escalate I am pursuing informal mediation, to get a fresh set of eyes in here. I think Brewecrewer is acting in good faith, but he is failing to assume the same thing for me.

Before it becomes a diff fest, I want to state my purpose is to establish a mediated dialogue to resolve the matter for good, not really to dwell on the matters of the past.