Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-05-27/Carabinieri

Where is the dispute?
The dispute is on parts of article Carabinieri and is actively being discussed by the two editors in disagreement on Talk:Carabinieri

Who is involved?

 * User:Bibiki
 * User:Noclador

What is the dispute?
The dispute is two pronged and is discussed in two separate sections of the Talk:Carabinieri page:
 * Carabinieri Resistance Record: User:Bibiki believes that the Carabinieri pre-1943 20+ years of unconditional and in fact diligent collaboration with Mussolini's fascist regime should be as clearly mentioned as their post-1943 resistance record.
 * Carabinieri Uniform, Colors and Insignia controversy: User:Bibiki thinks that mention should be made to the fact that the Carabinieri are one of the few armed forces or corps (maybe the only?) that have participated in WWII on the side of the Axis forces and have not significantly changed their appearance, uniform, marks, colors or insignia. User:Bibiki thinks that this deserves a mention because of the offense it causes to people of countries like Greece, Ethiopia and ex-Yugoslavia countries who were occupied by Italians, among them Carabinieri that looked practically the same. Please read here: http://fotios.org/node/2182

What would you like to change about this?
User:Bibiki would like to have his latest edits, currently reverted by User:Noclador, reinstated in their original form or with alternative phrasing as long as the main points made on Talk:Carabinieri are made in the article.

How do you think we can help?
User:Bibiki would like you to take a look at his latest edits that were reverted by User:Noclador and provide your opinion on whether they should have indeed been reverted based on the evidence provided on the relevant talk page sections here: Talk:Carabinieri. In case you do agree that the issues User:Bibiki brings up do deserve a mention but you believe that they should be phrased differently, please propose alternative phrasing.

Mediator notes
Mediation will take place on article's talk page for now. I have presented a summary there. -- QUANTUM ZENO  23:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

PS
(Note from a third party)

I don’t know how this works, as I’ve not seen this before, but you should probably know this was filed as a 3O case also, and there is a response from the other party there.