Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-06-30/Michael Tsarion

Where is the dispute?
The page for Michael Tsarion has been closed three times by Mr Phil Knight. This is a mistake. Michael Tsarion should have a biography here, or at least links to his sites. To say his is not notable is a mistake. Perhaps, when you receive more of these requests you will recognize that he is indeed worthy or inclusion on your wonderfully important site.

Who is involved?

 * Michael Tsarion


 * myself


 * everyone else who hasn't yet heard his message

What is the dispute?
Michael Tsarion deserves a biography here. He is notable.

What would you like to change about this?
Michael Tsarion deserves a biography here. He is notable.

For the last X-Years I used WIKI to look up "what is that or this"! Before WIKI I had to walk to my old "BRITANICA" in my living room! Now I have something, which is more-or-less real-time! Super and THANK YOU for that WIKI!

Now via what every search words I bump into a VID by a so-called Michael Tsarion! So what do now? Well I use WIKI to find some relevant information about that person!

And now I find nothing, because some people do not like him! Correctly assumed ??? Well I do not like HITLER or STALIN either, but for both you have some WIKI information!

And when GOOGLE shows me 119.000 search-hits for "Michael Tsarion", then I expect that WIKI has some INFO on that Person!

Not GOOD Info! Not BAD Info!

I expect only "pure INFO" just like on Uncel HITLER and Uncle STALIN or any other people I will never love!

How do you think we can help?
I'm not a believer in what Michael Tsarion says or represents, but he has a right to have something on wiki like everyone else. I mean you clearly allow people such as David Icke, who clearly represents similar ideas as to what Tsarion represents. So really, it's just a matter to where you at least give out something about Michael Tsarion, because we live in a time where anyone deserves to get ALL sides of the story, whether it be right or wrong.

Mediator notes
I apologize, but that kind of argument will not work. If you can provide me with background (diffs, etc), and explain to me the content side of this dispute, then maybe medcab can help. But this is not how to go about things on Wikipedia. If you want an advocate, please message me and I'll see what I can do. --Xavexgoem (talk) 18:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Tsarion is a shill and a sheepherder. A shill and a sheepherder? That is beyond absurd and truly ridiculous. It sheds light that you are in fact an establishment shill. Wikipedia is a joke. 100% leftist and globalist establishment propaganda.

Administrative notes
Obviously the Administers of Wiki are biased, probably Christian. I don't know much about Tsarion, but I know that every Christian priest in the last 2k years is "a shill and a sheepherder" lol. Tsarion is anti-religion and probably really upsets these weak minded people. You got that right Brother.