Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-01-15/

Where is the dispute?
The article on Prestige Hong Kong http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prestige_Hong_Kong

Who is involved?
Just a list of the users involved. For example:

Ngsweebee frazierdp

What is the dispute?
Several facts suggest that Prestige Hong Kong magazine is not an operating business entity. I said so in my edit of 12 January, objectively noting that "As of January 2010, the publication has disabled its telephone lines and taken down its website. It had closed down a sister publication, Power Magazine, in mid 2009." This edit was reversed recently, apparently by Ngsweebee.

But the website remains down, and the phones remain disabled.

What would you like to change about this?
The entry on Prestige should accurately reflect the facts about the business. For a business to use Wikipedia to extend a lie to its readers is wrong.

How do you think we can help?
Please, after confirming the facts, reinstate my edit of 12 January.

Mediator notes
This is not what mediation is for. If you want to know what mediation is for, read WP:MEDCABNOT. This is not what its for. I'm declining this case. The Wordsmith Communicate