Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-05-07/ Albert Pujols

Where is the dispute?
I was trying to add pertinent information concerning Albert Pujols' personal and financial involvement in the shutting of St. Louis's only classical music station

Who is involved?
Just a list of the users involved. For example:


 * Why Not A Duck
 * Killervogel5

What is the dispute?
The information about the KFUO controversy is very topical to the Albert Pujols article. My first edit could have been percieved as having a POV, so I corrected it, but my updated edit was removed by a Pujols fan who does not want any negative information posted on the entry for Albert Pujols.

What would you like to change about this?
I would like to be able to add neutral, pertinent information to a Wikipedia article without it being removed by an editor with a biased POV.

How do you think we can help?
I'm not sure what can be done, as I don't ever have issues with content being censored on Wikipedia. Any advice or help on a possible resolution would be welcome. Protecting the page would also help.

Mediator notes

 * 1) I would mediate this if I am acceptable to both of the listed parties. Hipocrite (talk) 20:45, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Old case, closing it out as it appears to have passed. I would encourage you to go to the talk page of the article to first work out differences, I don't see that happened in this case. --Wgfinley (talk) 22:39, 24 July 2010 (UTC)