Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-06-02/Template:South American football

Where is the dispute?
CONMEBOL pages.

What is the dispute?
This user keeps vandalising a template by reversing it to an obvious downgrade version even after I warned him/her about it. Despite the fact that I have explained throughly the reasons behind the method used on the template (with the support of certain individuals), he and his friend keep reversing pages and articles to downgraded versions simply to spite me (this vandalism is not limited to that template) while taking this I have said out of contexts and trying to come up with some bad excuses to their doing. There is some sign of TT, obvious meatpuppetry.

What would you like to change about this?
To stop trying to block progress towards the improvement of articles.

How do you think we can help?
To explain to these people that grudges shouldn't be a focus on wiki.

Discussion
I guess I'll be the first to comment. Jamen is taking things over the line by labeling things what they are not. First off, what he considers vandalism of a template is actually content dispute, and a vandalism case has already been thrown out because it is clearly a content dispute. There is strong opposition/issues raised about the template in question being discussed in a project talk page. It has come to the point where Jamen is increasingly in the minority position in support of the current status of the template and is looking for ways to discredit any user who does not hold his positions on the matter (like myself). This is how this cabal case came into fruition. There is no tagteaming simply because there is no coordinated effort between myself and MicroX (or any other user) simply because we are not coordinating any actions related to this template. We simply share a likeminded stance. There is no cabal. Various users, not limited to myself and MicroX, have raised some issues that Jamen is not willing want to address or continue addressing. And lastly, there is no meatpuppetry because neither of us have recruited the other as a new member simply to support a position. We were established users who joined independently long prior this disagreement with Jamen. MicroX and myself don't share the same opinion on everything. Digirami (talk) 21:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The reporting user has been blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing. An unblock request was denied, as this is the 4th time this user has been blocked for the same offense. Marking as closed since this user probably won't be back (at least not anytime soon). Netalarm talk 12:52, 10 June 2010 (UTC)