Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-07-11/User talk:Anglicanus

Where is the dispute?
User_talk:Anglicanus

Who is involved?

 * Anglicanus
 * naturalhomes

What is the dispute?
The user Anglicanus edited the article Graham Leonard leaving the question, "What does 'can be found' mean?" in the revision history. Since there was a question relating to my edit I answered it in the user's talk pages. The user responded inappropriately to which I responded with a reference to No personal attacks. Since then he has continued to behave inappropriately most recently saying, "Please refer to pompous arse for guidance on how to stop being one." If you read the user's talk pages you will see that I am not the only editor this user has attacked in this way.

What would you like to change about this?
I would like Anglicanus to accept that personal attacks are not justified under any circumstances.

How do you think we can help?
Could someone just give Anglicanus a gentle reminder about wiki etiquette.

Mediator notes
Hello, natural. I will look into the matter and take the proper course of action. I'll keep you informed. Bobby122  Contact Me   (C)  02:14, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I issued a reminder to remain civil at all times. I will keep the case open for a little while to make sure everything is okay between the two editors. Bobby122   Contact Me   (C)  01:35, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Discussion
I believe editors have to archive their talk pages, not delete them as User_talk:Anglicanus has. It seems that Anglicanus continues to disrespect Wikipedia policy on civility and now points editors to an inappropriate article attributing it to Wikipedia when it is actually meta.wikimedia.org. There is an obvious risk here that editors who open legitimate discussions regarding Anglicanus' edits may be faced with uncivil behaviour. Naturalhomes 14:58, 24 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I will greatly appreciate it if editor naturalhomes immediately ceases his ongoing personal campaign of harrassment of me on Wikipedia. I should be able to edit articles without receiving gratuitous uppity and patronising comments on my talk page.  Such behaviour only detracts from my own enjoyment as an editor.  His hypocritical complaints of incivility against me are not appreciated.  If he can't leave comments for me in a polite and appropriate manner then he shouldn't make any comments at all.  And, for the record, editors are perfectly entitled to delete comments from their talk pages. Anglicanus (talk) 14:07, 24 July 2010 (UTC)