Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-09-28/Sholom Rubashkin

Where is the dispute?
Sholom Rubashkin, more specifically, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sholom_Rubashkin#Rubashkin_was_not_the_CEO.--KerAvelt (talk) 05:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Who is involved?

 * User:Nomoskedasticity
 * User:KerAvelt

What is the dispute?
There are those who say he is CEO, because such has been reported in media stories, and there are those who say he is VP because such was also reported in media stories. Those that say he was VP brought a proof from a story that that his attorney clearly says he was not CEO and another story (about the same day) that says that his attorney clearly said he is not chief operating officer and that the prosecutors agreed with that, the other side responded that just said COO is different than CEO, the other side then responded that that story clearly meant CEO and brought a number of proofs, the other side then responded that constitutes original research.--KerAvelt (talk) 05:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

What would you like to change about this?
Figure out who is right already.--KerAvelt (talk) 05:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

How do you think we can help?
Please clarify what constitutes original research.--KerAvelt (talk) 05:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)