Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-12-01/File 18

Where is the dispute?
Dispute at File 18‎ (and minor spill-out at Reachout Trust‎).

Who is involved?

 * User:Liftarn
 * User:Jeremystalked

What is the dispute?
User:Jeremystalked repeatedly removing sourced content with the argument that it's not verifiable it is not available on-line from the original source. Jeremystalked rejects version stored in archives as Jeremystalked think they might have been tampered with.

What would you like to change about this?
I would like to have a stop to the deletion of sourced content.

How do you think we can help?
Clarify how WP:RS and WP:V applies to on-line archives of electronic newsletters.

Mediator notes
I am willing to mediate this dispute, if all parties consent to my presence. Please indicate below if you accept: - Gburnes (talk) 11:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

I have reviewed the stated policies and strongly believe I could clarify in this dispute: Gburnes (talk) 11:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

FYI. If there is any question about the factuality of anything in the actual File 18 article, or if there is some question about the validity of the "Law Enforcement Primer on Occult Crime," Wikipedia user Desertphile could be asked to provide authoritative answers to such questions that might be in dispute since Desertphile is one of the informational sourced that was used by the State of California to create the Law Enforcement Primer. Also Desertphile maintains archives of File 18 including private letters between himself and Hicks. Also 3 of the links are either to Desertphile's web site or to my own. If the legitimacy of any of the content on our web sites is in question, email me at frice@skeptictank.org FYI. None (talk) 20:33, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Administrative notes
LTC b2412 Troops Talk 09:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)