Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2011-02-23/

Where is the dispute?
This section should explain where the problem is. Link to the articles where the dispute is taking place.

Who is involved?
The list of the users involved. For example:


 * User:A
 * User:B

Acceptance of Mediation
Please place your signature here to indicate that you are aware of this mediation process and want to participate in it:

What is the dispute?
A calm explanation of what the problem is. Be as precise as you wish, but avoid general statements such as "User:X has a POV regarding article Y", as that's usually unhelpful. Provide diffs if possible, but try to keep the description brief. A list of issues that need to be addressed, such as this, would also help.

What would you like to change about this?
Here, tell us what you would like to changed. Does the conversation need better structure? Are folks having difficulty communicating? Are they talking past each other? Stuff like that.

How do you think we can help?
We are here to help you, but we need to know how. Sometimes mediators will look at a dispute and have no idea where to start, so please help us out. Do note that we will not "take sides" in any dispute.

Discussion
Did you manage to discover what happened with the modifications to List of Transitional Fossils and the deletion of page Genus X, Species X? Reply to Wikipedia page Mark Chapman 1964. As I stated in a previous listing for mediation, the topic is a rather serious one from the perspective of evolutionary biology and the need to establish international contact with others with the same spectrum of biological parameters. The issues raised warrant international access by doctors and patients alike. Wikipedia may be an appropriate forum. Despite its unusual aspects details about Genus X, Species X (which resembles Homo Sapiens) are fully supported by medical imagery, temperature readings with scientifically-calibrated instruments, blood tests, multimeter readings and a host of other experimentation.