Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2011-02-26/Ambarish Srivastava

Request details
The locus of this dispute is that and  have dissenting opinions about whether information pertaining to Ambarish Srivastava's professional memberships, poetry, and published books sections should be included in the article Ambarish Srivastava.

Where is the dispute?
Ambarish Srivastava's professional memberships, poetry, and published books sections should be included in the article Ambarish Srivastava.

Who is involved?

 * User:Spjayswal67
 * User:SpacemanSpiff
 * User:Vassyana

Acceptance of Mediation
Please place your signature here to indicate that you are aware of this mediation process and want to participate in it:
 * ~ Spjayswal67 (talk) 18:29, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

What is the dispute?
The locus of this dispute is that and  have dissenting opinions about whether information pertaining to Ambarish Srivastava's professional memberships, poetry, and published books should be included in the article Ambarish Srivastava. All discussions related to third opinion are available at this.

What would you like to change about this?
Ambarish Srivastava's professional memberships, poetry, and published books should be included in the article Ambarish Srivastava which are deleted by.

How do you think we can help?
Because all reliable sources are in Hindi languages so please involve those mediators who know Hindi so that they can understand it better. All discussions are available at article's talk page at this. Some other reliable sources.This Scanned News page 4 of “Vyas Bhartee” Newspaper published at Sitapur on 26 August 2010 (Title:‘Ambarish Srivastava vishwastareey vyakti bane’,This Scanned News page 5 of “Swatantra Bharat” Newspaper published at Lucknow on 31 October 2010 (Title: ‘Sanskar Bhartee dwara chitra aadharit kavya srijan pratiyogita ka hua aayojan’,This Scanned News page 7 of “Hindustan” Newspaper published at Lucknow on 31 March 2010 (Title: ‘Sameer ke poot bade balshalee’,This Scanned News page 4 of “Amar Ujala” Newspaper published at Lucknow on 16 March 2010 (Title:‘Meree Aarjoo men aakar tum laut ke na jana’,

Mediator notes
Hello there! This is NicholasTurnbull, your mediator. I'm going to leave talk page messages to the other people listed on this mediation page before we begin. If they'd be kind enough to sign their name affirming their desire to participate under the "Acceptance of mediation" bit, and if they'd like, say a few words in Discussion about what's going wrong and how we can help. I understand there is a content dispute of some sort and whilst we unfortunately can't deal with content issues directly (as we've got to be neutral), we can deal with the disputes surrounding them and offer some guidance into how to get you all in agreement. First, however, we need everyone to accept the mediation. --NicholasTurnbull &#124; (talk) 06:40, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Administrative notes
This case has been closed as the named parties failed to affirm their acceptance of mediation in over 7 days of the case being opened. --NicholasTurnbull &#124; (talk) 11:18, 16 March 2011 (UTC)