Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2011-07-13/Dominique Strauss-Kahn sexual assault case

Where is the dispute?
Dominique Strauss-Kahn sexual assault case:

Who is involved?

 * LessHeard vanU

Acceptance of Mediation

 * ~ Wran (talk) 17:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

What is the dispute?
Oversighter wrote me: "I consider this edit to violate both Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point and Wikipedia:Disruptive editing, and also Wikipedia:Assume good faith. As I noted previously, if you are not able to conduct yourself according to expected standards of behaviour and congeniality then you may find yourself unable to edit at all." I can't see any connexion between the referenced rules and anything I've done: he offered no explanation

What would you like to change about this?
Indeed the conversation does need better structure and folks are having difficulty communicating: partly it's a question of illiteracy in unintelligible messages he sent me previously, which I pointed out; so his ego is involved. In others' involvement leading up to the present complaint a couple of editors paid no attention to arguments I and others offered, and continually cited wiki rules that they clearly misapplied; so we were talking past each other.

How do you think we can help?
Try to get this guy and perhaps others involved to state clearly EXACTLY what they object to and to give clear justifications for their beliefs, and to respond to my responses with reason instead of abuse and sanctions

Mediator notes
Closed. -- J  (t)  22:49, 28 July 2011 (UTC)