Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/User:Lucky 6.9 reverting his own Talk page

Please observe Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.

Request Information
''This section currently largely represents the requester's view. However, it can be edited by everyone with the goal to eventually represent a consensus. The mediator reserves the right to revert or change any edits in this section.''

Request made by
20:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Where is the issue taking place?

 * User_talk:Lucky_6.9, edit history

Who's involved?

 * Parties:, ,
 * Users who confirmed:
 * Users who have not replied:, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 * Users who I couldn't ask because they are blocked: ,
 * Apparent sockpuppets: (I assume these are be sock puppets, based on their contributions) ,

What's going on?

 * Lucky_6.9 is an Admin who deletes many articles with little justification, then when users try to discuss them on his Talk page, per WP:Resolving_disputes he simply deletes the discussion and reverts the page. He appears to work closely with user WarthogDemon in this reversion practice.  In the last 30 days, Lucky_6.9 has averaged at least one reversion of his own Talk page per day (more if WarthogDemon's reversions are counted).  This obscures complaints about Lucky_6.9's behavior, essentially whitewashing his behavior.  It is unWikipedian behavior.  I tried to discuss this with Lucky_6.9 by posting on his Talk page here, and my discussion was reverted within 12 minutes by WarthogDemon "per request of Lucky".

Goal of this mediation

 * Find a solution to address concerns that Lucky_6.9 appears to be censoring any critisism about his edits. If this mediation fails, it is up to requester to bring the case up at Requests for arbitration.

Discretion required?

 * Not by requester. Anyone who feels they need descretion, please feel free to contact mediator by e-mail.

Case history
This case was deleted by Lucky in December 2006 and undeleted by Sebastian in November 20, 2007.

For details see Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive164.

Discussion
Please keep discussions on the talk page.