Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Nominations/Coolcat


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of an unsuccessful nomination to join the Mediation Committee. Please do not modify it.

Coolcat
I can stay calm, make parties that are throught to throught talk (IRL). I have been working with multiple controversial articles, some have very slow progress, but I think there is some progress. Best way to prove is if I get a case. That way I can show you what I am made out of. Thank you for your time. Preferably some article I never touched or people I've never met (for best results). --Cool Cat My Talk 07:03, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Mediation committee:
 * Neutral: Didn't you just upload some copywritten material and make a fuss when people started treating it as GFDL? I think that ought to be cleared up before anything else. -- Uncle Ed (talk) 21:49, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

Outside opinions:

Oppose. Based on my experience today, this user advertises him/herself right now as a Mediator without qualifying that s/he is an informal one. Fails to even accord the most cursory research of disputes s/he intends to mediate; for e.g. aggregated my dispute with Sam Spade &mdash; to whom we already have an actual Mediator for, Danny, with another editor Sam Spade is in dispute with, without even checking to see that the disputes are unrelated and I, in fact, have never heard of the other respective party. Language and disposition appear, at best, lacking maturity, and at worse, abrasive and invasive. That said, Sam Spade has accepted this informal mediator, so if the other party that Sam Spade is currently in dispute with as well (but, again, entirely unrelated to myself), also agrees, then the Committee will be afforded a chance to observe the nominee's skills. El_C 12:06, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I was trying to help. The other party is listed in another dispute in Administrators noticeboard. I assumed you were related. -I do not have to be on the list to help people out. I am sorry I have wasted your time. -Cool Cat My Talk 20:44, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * No harm done. I, nonetheless, urge you to research future disputes you wish to involve yourself in intensively and extensively rather than 'assume' as the resulting errors (which are entirely and easily avoidable) significantly damage your credibility as a prospective mediator. El_C 23:58, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Oppose. Mr. Coolcat has attempted to establish himself as a mediator of disputes in which he has a very strong POV; examples include: Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh, Talk:Armenian Genocide, and Talk:Greco-Turkish relations. Attempts to force format of talk and resists requests to cease. See current discussions on my talk page (and elsewhere, including archives of preceding talk pages), as well as User:Coolcat/mediat which he likes to transclude into talk pages. Uncool. &mdash; Davenbelle 19:06, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)


 * I know noting regarding Nagorno-Karabakh. I did not talk about Nagorno-Karabakh in discussion. --Cool Cat My Talk 20:44, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I voiced that opinions should not bet a part of Armenian Genocide article and establishing the article as a solid fact requires concrete documentation from archives. Just google for it and first 10 is pro anti genocide websites. Both sides of the conversation will dispute some of the top 10 pages. There is lots of propaganda on both sides that I do not want to be a part of the article. Apparently that makes me a horrible person. --Cool Cat My Talk 20:44, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * As for talk, you are talking how horrible of a person I am, I am making suggestions how to improve the article. --Cool Cat My Talk 20:44, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Greco-Turkish relations my contributions are visible, non to article as it was locked before I arrived, my suggestions are out there. I lived in both countries and I know about their relationship somewhat. --Cool Cat My Talk 20:44, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * ''The above nomination to join the Mediation Committee is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it.