Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Nominations/Grunt


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful nomination to join the Mediation Committee. Please do not modify it.

Grunt
(Grunt | (talk) | (contributions))

sannse tells me there is a shortage of mediators, so I would like to apply for a spot. I feel that I should be able to mediate disputes well due to my overall approachability and good nature. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 02:07, 2004 Sep 2 (UTC)


 * MC opinion :
 * Support -- sannse (talk) 18:26, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Support - SweetLittleFluffyThing 19:15, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC) admitedly, I do not know you very well, but I never heard bad about you (which is actually quite unfrequent I must say :-)), and you sound nice guy (good nature is what I perceive indeed) and we need more people, so I am quite confident I can support you :-) anyway... here it is :-)
 * Renew my support. (may I ? :-)) SweetLittleFluffyThing 00:02, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. Angela. 02:19, Sep 4, 2004 (UTC)
 * Support -- BCorr | &#1041;&#1088;&#1072;&#1081;&#1077;&#1085; 20:05, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Welcome aboard! [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (talk)]] 02:17, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * I'll freely admit that I'm just following consensus here, but I also support. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 22:22, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * Support Tuf-Kat 01:55, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC)
 * Support; and nice templates (I'll be borrowing some!) --Uncle Ed 14:21, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * SupportDanny 23:11, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. Ambi 00:08, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * Community opinion :
 * Of course I support. --Lst27 19:20, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * I agree that we need more mediators, and I think Grunt could be quite helpful in that capacity. --Michael Snow 18:46, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Excellent choice Jwrosenzweig 23:31, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Summary:
 * MC : 10 supports, no opposition
 * Community : 3 supports, none neutral, no opposition
 * Jimbo : no veto

Welcome 11 September 2004. BCorr | &#1041;&#1088;&#1072;&#1081;&#1077;&#1085;


 * ''The above nomination to join the Mediation Committee is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it.