Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Nominations/Robocracy


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of an unsuccessful nomination to join the Mediation Committee. Please do not modify it.

User:Robocracy
 Nominated: 01:39, November 16 2006 (UTC) view edit watch I'd like to join the mediation committee because I'd enjoy doing it and it's actually a way that I can contribute to Wikipedia, regularly. Generally, I don't do research much, but just tend to go through articles on subjects I'm interested in (which is usually politics and economics). If you'd look at my edits, you'll see that I've consistently been relatively fair, removing what I've perceived as bias from different views. For an example of my neutrality, see Talk:Classical liberalism, where I've attempted to reconcile a dispute between two conflicting, somewhat biased parties. I actually originally came here to request a mediator. After reading that you're low on mediators, I thought I'd volunteer to help.

Mediation committee:
 * I'm going to have to oppose right now. You're well-intentioned enough, you just seem too new (with 189 edits), and I don't believe you're familiar enough with Wiki-process yet (only 23 WP-space edits). Come back in a few months, once you've got a bit more experience under your belt. ^ demon [yell at me] 22:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)



Outside opinions:

Comments:

Closed as no consensus to promote. Essjay ( Talk )  09:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * ''The above nomination to join the Mediation Committee is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it.