Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Nominations/Wizardman


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful nomination to join the Mediation Committee. Please do not modify it.

Wizardman
 Nominated: 01:05, March 15 2008 (UTC) view edit watch

I am nominating Wizardman to join the Mediation Committee. Wizardman has been on Wikipedia for two years, and has been an administrator for more than one (RfA). With over 34,000 edits, he has written 3 good articles as well as 25 articles featured in 'Did you know?'.

Within dispute resolution, Wizardman has mediated a number of cases for the Mediation Cabal. However, unfortunately, many cannot be located due to reshuffles and the fact they were from either 2006 or early 2007; however, one brilliant example can be found at Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-06-26 List of Mario series enemies (see accompanying discussion). In addition, he frequently contributes thoughtfully to discussions as an informal opinion, and always shows the intent to help resolve the dispute with his comments.

Wizardman's mediation to date of Requests for mediation/Second Amendment to the United States Constitution has been top-shelf, and I have absolutely no hesitation in nominating him to become a member of the Committee. Wizardman is a thoughtful, kind, helpful and intelligent user who I feel would be a great asset to the Mediation Committee.

Respectfully, Daniel (talk) 01:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate your acceptance of the nomination here: I accept. Wizardman  02:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Questions from Committee members:
 * What are the core principles of Mediation Committee mediation?
 * In short, the core principles are that mediation is a voluntary procedure in which all parties work toward establishing a consensus/compromise. The core principle of being a mediator is to be a neutral party to help foster a compromise between all parties. Wizardman  02:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Discussions during formal mediation are privileged; they cannot be used against the parties in later proceedings (e.g. RfArb/RfC). Why is that important?
 * By cutting off the idea or future retribution, the participants don't have to be worried about sharing their opinions as to what needs to be done. If someone's worried about future opposition at an rfar based on comments they make here, then we're not getting the full picture of what really needs to be done. Wizardman  02:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * What prior experience do you have in resolving disputes on Wikipedia? Please provide links, and how will these experiences help you to be an effective Committee member?
 * The main experience I have was, as Daniel mentioned above. I mediated a few MedCab cases, and if i could remember the names of them I would bring them up. The only one I remember off the top of my head was the List of Mario Series enemies above, one of the few bright spots in the Episodes and Characters war. I have provided some third opinions as well. This experience would help me be an effective committee member since it's helped me learn patience with other users, that it can take a while to formulate a consensus that all parties are satisfied with. It's also helped me look at past histories of consensus attempts that have been done in the past, to see where this dispute has been in an attempt to avoid going down that route again. Wizardman  02:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Mediation Committee:
 * Support per nomination statement, as nominator. Daniel (talk) 01:39, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support excellent skills and very level-headed. Shell babelfish 02:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. Wizardman's ability to bring a dispute under his wing, settle the parties down and get them agreeing on a compromise has always impressed me, and I am confident he can transfer that ability over to work with the Mediation Committee. Additionally, his personality traits—I have always had him down as a calm, collected, thoughtful and wise editor and administrator—will be an asset to the Committee in its "behind-the-scenes" work: I can very much imagine him as being an opinion to be respected on the Committee mailing list in the coming months. Daniel's complimentary opening statement simply serves to cement my opinion on Wizardman's nomination, and to this end, I am happy to support. I look forward to working with you, Wizardman, in the future, if you are promoted. AGK § 11:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support, Wizardman is extremely competent. AGK said it quite well, he will be an asset to the Committee and an asset to the community as a mediator. Keilana | Parlez ici 13:19, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. Sane, clueful and all-around good guy. Vassyana (talk) 15:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support of course - a very calm editor who is good at resolving disputes. I actually asked him to nom himself earlier this week :-)  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  22:21, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. Ral315 (talk) 10:38, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Community opinions:
 * Very strong support - will do excellent work here. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 07:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong support. Rudget . 15:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Always a sane voice in discussions, manages to keep things less heated. Excellent choice. Relata refero (talk) 18:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Excellent administrator, and excellent Wikipedian overall. Has my trust and support. Acalamari 02:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Surely a fine addition to the committee in my opinion.  Snowolf How can I help? 01:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Support; The candidate will be an asset to the committee. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 02:55, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Support, a rational and positive thinker. Excellent user and admin. - Mtmelendez (Talk) 20:42, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep - nothing but positive interactions. —Animum (talk) 02:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee:
 * Appointed.
 * For the Mediation Committee, WjBscribe 00:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * ''The above nomination to join the Mediation Committee is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it.