Wikipedia:Meetup/Atlanta/SSWC 2018

= SSWC: A Truly Authentic Audience: Student Editing and Writing on Wikipedia =

Presentation details
Eric Grunwald, Lecturer, English Language Studies, MIT

Student Success in Writing Conference

Savannah, GA, April 6, 2018

egrunwal@mit.edu

Overview
Wikipedia, now in its 17th year, remains an online space where accuracy, neutrality, and fair representation matters. Empowering a diverse group of editors (including students!) to contribute to Wikipedia (the largest collaborative writing project in history!) is one way to ensure that high quality information is freely available to all.

This afternoon's session will introduce participants to becoming Wikipedia editors to cultivating a greater understanding of how to create classroom assignments on Wikipedia that will engage and empower writing students while reinforcing core writing and communication skills.

Participant list
Please add your Wikipedia username below. If you do not have one, you may later simply go to en.wikipedia.org and create one. TIP: Don't use your real name, as the rare person my flame you. (I'm WritingMan.)



Click "edit source." Add the # sign (to continue numbering.)

Then, create your signature by typing four tildes (~) in a row and clicking "Save changes."
 * 1) WritingMan (talk) 16:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

We are NOT in a post-fact world
Video on verifiability

Also, learn more about

Articles written or edited students
Undergraduate:

The International Entrepreneur Rule

Suicide in South Korea

Graduate:

Artificial Imagination

Skin friction drag

= FAQ = How reliable is Wikipedia? Who edits Wikipedia? Also worth knowing about
 * Check out Accuracy of content
 * Check out Wikipedia
 * Wikipedia is a work in progress: perfection is not required
 * The perfect article

= Thinking like a Wikipedian = Basic guidelines, communication customs, editing customs

The focus here is on developing your "Wikipedia hat," so you can read and evaluate Wikipedia articles based on Wikipedia's standards, not those from your own areas of expertise. (n.b.: Modified from exercise created by User:AmandaRR123)

Read over the following Wikipedia policy/guideline pages, and then use what you've learned to evaluate one of the articles listed.

(Hint: Read "nutshells" and intros most carefully, then skim the rest of each policy/guideline page. That will give you the sense you need.)


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * The perfect article
 * Identifying reliable sources
 * Neutral point of view
 * Be bold
 * Your first article
 * What Wikipedia is not
 * Manual of Style

''Articles to evaluate: pick one, and use your new "Wikipedia hat" to evaluate them. How might they be improved?''


 * Mehrangiz Manouchehrian
 * Mel King
 * Judith Frank
 * Patricia Santana

Rating and Communicating on Wikipedia
 * What Class Labels mean (Featured Article, C-Class, Start-Class, etc.): Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment
 * The perfect article
 * Talk page guidelines

= Some options for making your first edit = Citation Hunt: A tool from Wikimedia Foundation Labs to help where citation needed

WikiGrabber: Another tool to help find where citation needed

= Training to edit Wikipedia =
 * Cheatsheet
 * Featured Articles
 * Policies and guidelines
 * Help:Getting started
 * Starting an article

Going forward: some resources to help you determine what and how to contribute

 * WikiProject
 * What Class Labels mean (Featured Article, C-Class, Start-Class, etc.): Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment
 * Portals on wikipedia
 * Requested articles
 * Missing articles
 * Stubs
 * Most-wanted articles
 * Translating
 * Red links
 * Women in Red

Good Digital Citizenship and Activism in Wikipedia: Underrepresented Groups and Topics
written by User:AmandaRR123, February 2016

Problem: Wikipedia is a globally distributed network where judgement of quality is not based around contributor expertise, but rather work according to the standards of the project itself -- the most legible unit of work is a good citation. As one of the oldest communities on the Internet, Wikipedia gives students to a chance to practice good digital citizenship: use their critical thinking skills to discover community values, norms and styles of communication, and contribute in a way that will make sense to other community members.

However, Wikipedia can, like many other communities, have a bias towards the status quo. Therefore, those working on issues related to underrepresented groups can expect to be accused of activism, bias, an agenda, as if those things do not already exist on Wikipedia

Digital citizenship is doubly important to those working on issues related to underrepresented groups: one must know how to communicate effectively using community standards to convince the Wikipedian community that changes in the status quo does not automatically equal violating policy, and that you are still partners in the same goal of wanting to improve the encyclopedia.

Resources we can draw from

 * Google News
 * Google Books
 * Google Scholar Note! You can synchronize Google Scholar with your institution's library. Check it out!
 * Better Googling: MIT Libraries Google search tips