Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks/STU

San Luis Obispo Bill of Rights Defense Committee

 * Site: http://www.slo-bordc.org/link/wikipedia/view
 * Only uses opening paragraph from USA PATRIOT Act.
 * Mentions Wikipedia, and provides link to article.
 * No GFDL mention.
 * Almost certainly fair use.

Sci Peeps

 * The cited article is gone. There may be others. decltype (talk) 14:28, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Science 24
See Mirrors_and_forks/Abc

scpover.net

 * Found them with this Google query:  -- Martin von Gagern 01:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * is the server name configured in Apache, but doesn't resolve
 * All virtual hosts on the same machine (list probably inclomplete)
 * Many (perhaps all) domains seem to have www.* as a CNAME as well
 * Many different languages
 * Not all articles; link to original version for others
 * Not a live mirror
 * Described as “parked domains” by the operator

Scripophily.net

 * Site: http://www.scripophily.net
 * Example: http://www.scripophily.net/lefrhme19.html
 * No mention of Wikipedia - uses material from H.L. Mencken article.
 * Still not compliant. Lotsofissues 06:17, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Any progress on this one? 84.235.135.246 10:02, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Nope. Example: http://www.webcitation.org/5m6moDhYo (archive of http://www.scripophily.net/amhocode1.html).  Some of this content is my creation; I could sue. --Elvey (talk) 08:15, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

search.com

 * Site: www.search.com
 * Part of CNET Networks
 * Example: www.search.com/reference/Thomas_Johnson_(designer)
 * States: "Wikipedia. Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Are you an expert in this subject? Join the discussion and share your knowledge at Wikipedia.org" with links to GFDL at gnu.org and to original article
 * Pages (which sometimes also draw from other sources) end with "Copyright ©2007 CNET Networks, Inc. All Rights Reserved"

SearchEnterpriseLinux.com

 * Site: http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/qna/0,289202,sid39_gci913129,00.html
 * Contains a small section of the article about vendor lock-in
 * Mentions Wikipedia, but has no link
 * No GFDL Link
 * Seems fair use. Andre Engels 01:50, 17 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Search-People-Finder.info
see Mirrors_and_forks/Def

SearchSpaniel.com

 * Site: http://www.searchspaniel.com/

seriouslostfan.com
see Mirrors_and_forks/Def

servinghistory.com
see Mirrors_and_forks/Def

sexyclopedia.com
Site: http://www.sexyclopedia.com/ Example: http://www.sexyclopedia.com/?title=Category:Eastern_Orthodox_Wikipedians

singaporemoms.com

 * Site: http://www.singaporemoms.com/parenting_encyclopedia.html
 * Example: http://www.singaporemoms.com/parenting/Homeopathy from Homeopathy
 * seems to be a fairly complete compy inlcludeing pics
 * mentions wikipedia and GFDL in it's copyright policy after a click through.
 * no link back to specific articles. No mention of authors but has link on "how to see transparent copy" with link to www.wikipedia.org and to local copy of GFDL plus link to local description of how to find original article. --Henrygb 01:59, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * no action taken as yet.Geni 23:35, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Sinoz

 * Site: http://www.sinoz.com/articles/
 * Example: http://www.sinoz.com/articles/Fresnel_zone_plate from Zone plate.
 * Looks like it mirrors entire Wikipedia
 * Contains link to GFDL and mention of Wikipedia, but no link to source Wikipedia article. Have sent a letter about this. --Laura Scudder | Talk 23:23, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

Sir Tom Jones Online

 * Site: http://www.freewebs.com/jvprn/index.htm
 * Example: http://www.freewebs.com/jvprn/discography.htm
 * Wikipedia content: Tom Jones (Singer)
 * no mention or link back to Wikipedia
 * no mention of GFDL
 * contact: tomrocks65 AT optonline.net
 * no action taken as yet. 22:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

siumforcongress.com
06:59, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Site: http://siumforcongress.com/
 * Wikipedia content: home page contains text snipped from Wikipedia articles about dynamic linking.  Clicking through links eventually leads you to lists of DLLs; clicking on each DLL will take you to a page that invites you to download software.
 * no mention or link back to Wikipedia
 * no mention of GFDL

Skwik

 * Site: www.skwik.com/wiki/
 * Example: taken from System of a Down
 * The site is content-wise basically a pretty poor rip-off of the band-entries from en.wikipedia.org. Most band descriptions originate from here, sometimes 1:1, sometimes just the beginning sentence. Images are not copied or linked from wikipedia.
 * There is no link either to the GFDL or the original Wikipedia article present, no mentioning of Wikipedia at all, including the disclaimers.
 * I have send an email to info AT skwik.com and informed the site's webmaster of this violation of Wikipedia's license. --Johnnyw July 9, 2005 16:03 (UTC)
 * I received a positive answer: "Thank you very much for your comments and recommendations. We really appreciate them. We'll edit the site to comply with GFDL requirements and we'll do our best to give credits to Wikipedia.  We also do our best to contribute content to Wikipedia." I'll try to keep an eye on this issue.--Johnnyw 13:39, July 10, 2005 (UTC)

skinnymouse.com

 * Site: www.skinnymouse.com/knowledge
 * Example: http://www.skinnymouse.com/knowledge/knowledgewiki.php?l=1&topic=Sony+HiFD
 * More research requested
 * Looks reasonable to me (except for the fact there is no actual wikipedia content either at the Sony HiFD link above or at )
 * GFDL statement and link to GFDL at gnu.org
 * Link to original article and to XML export version, (thus mentioning Wikipedia)
 * Even link to Wikipedia disclaimer
 * As of 23:11, 3 December 2005 (UTC) --Henrygb

Slimer.org

 * Site: http://www.slimer.org/
 * Example page: http://www.slimer.org/d/a/al/albania.html
 * no mention of Wikipedia
 * no link to original page
 * every page ends with "This information is distributed under the terms of GNU Free Documentation License" and link to FDL at http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html

SmartPedia
(Upgraded from low compliance)
 * Site: SmartPedia
 * Apparently only Wikipedia content
 * No mention of any copyright other than:
 * Some contents copyright 2004 QuotesPlace.com. All rights reserved world wide.
 * at the bottom of the pages.

First standard letter sent by Kwekubo 20:40, 29 May 2004 (UTC)
 * No mention of Wikipedia
 * No mention of GNU/FDL
 * No link to original article

As of May 31, Smartpedia now says in small type at bottom:
 * "This document is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
 * GFDL | SOURCE"

GFDL links to the gnu.org text, and SOURCE links to the Wikipedia article, but there is no actual text credit given to Wikipedia.

On the main page: "Smartpedia is run by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation." Someone going to write them? This is not only a cheek, it could also get us into legal trouble. -- stw (Talk) 20:48, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * Status changed to medium compliance. Kwekubo 15:33, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)


 * Their version of my user page modifies the template I use at the top of my page that links to the original contained here so that it replaces "Wikipedia" to "Smartpedia" and breaks the link itself. - Lucky13pjn 20:00, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * In fact, they replace "wikipedia" by "smartpedia" almost everywhere.  Their version of wiki is at http://www.smartpedia.com/wiki-sb.html, and they claim that "the English-language Smartpedia is, by far, the world's largest wiki; the German-language Smartpedia is the second-largest, while the other Smartpedias fill many of the remaining slots". -- Aleph4 17:44, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Update as of September 30, 2005: They still link to the source article and the GFDL as described above, but they also still havent changed the whole "Wikipedia" → "Smartpedia" thing. - Lucky13pjn 15:18, 30 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Update - site is 404.

SM201
(I guess, their Main page says "The SM-201 / BDSM Academy / BackDrop Club WikiPedia")

Corvus cornix 00:00, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Snazon.com

 * Site: Snazon.com
 * Example: http://www.snazon.com/encyclopedia/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion (from ca Nov 17 2003)
 * Contains "From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia" text
 * Mentions Wikipedia, but link is local (to copy of About), not to us
 * Link to GNU FDL does not work -404 error.
 * No link to article.

Snowpedia

 * Site: snowvision.org.nz/snowpedia
 * link to current version of article & Wikipedia main page
 * link to the GFDL on www.gnu.org
 * Seems to be in Medium compliance, as links to GNU on GNU site.Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry 23:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

source-of-knowledge.com
LarsSanders 09:19, 4 August 2005 (UTC) LarsSanders 09:25, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Site: http://www.source-of-knowledge.com/
 * live mirror; wikitech-l list has been informed
 * blocked by admin LarsSanders 18:28, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * No mention of GFDL or any kind of copyright, e.g:
 * http://www.source-of-knowledge.com/default.asp?t=Wikipedia
 * has Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia at the bottom of each page, possibly because that is in the orignal.
 * no contact details; the server IP reveals this site: http://67.168.102.196/, see http://67.168.102.196/contact_us.asp for contact form and http://67.168.102.196/Terms_Conditions.asp for some laughable terms.

Snyke

 * Site: http://encyclopedie-en.snyke.com/ with 7 languages (change en)
 * Example: of Albania
 * Ends article with "License : GFDL - Source: Wikipedia - Article" and links to GNU copy of GFDL, Wikipedia and original article. --Henrygb 18:30, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

somecoolsite.com
See Mirrors_and_forks/Vwxyz

songnhong.com
See Mirrors_and_forks/Vwxyz

specwire.com
See Mirrors_and_forks/Vwxyz

Sopranopedia

 * site: www.thesopranos.com and wiki.thesopranos.com/Main_Page with pages related to The Sopranos
 * example: wiki.thesopranos.com/Sicily
 * no obvious mention on article page of Wikipedia, original article or GFDL
 * wiki Main Page says "This page uses content from Wikipedia. The original article was at Main Page. The list of authors can be seen in the page history. As with The Sopranos Encyclopedia, the text of Wikipedia is available under the Text of the GNU Free Documentation License" with largely suitable links (except that it does not mirror Wikipedia Main Page).
 * Most wikilinks are dead. Also, Wikipedia is mentioned in some cleanup tags. Example: wiki.thesopranos.com/Jon_Bon_Jovi

space.cenet.org.cn

 * Example: http://space.cenet.org.cn/user1/1654/archives/2006/4984.html
 * Copy of old version of Liberal paradox
 * No mention of Wikipedia or GFDL
 * Bottom of page states "Copyright © 2005 CENET博客"
 * Appears from links to be copy of encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Liberal+Paradox at TheFreeDictionary
 * May be individual user page

Spock.com

 * Not a gross violation. Only a short excerpt of the article, with source given. To be fully compliant, the page should probably also mention CC-BY-SA. A link to the original article is enough to fulfill the requirement to attribute the authors. decltype (talk) 14:09, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Spokeo.com

 * To be fully compliant, the page should also mention CC-BY-SA. A link to the original article is enough to fulfill the requirement to attribute the authors. -84user (talk) 16:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

SportsHead

 * Still infringing. I do not think I hold copyright to any of the articles they host. decltype (talk) 14:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Sprinko

 * Site: www.encyclopedia.sprinko.com
 * Example: www.encyclopedia.sprinko.com/index.php?title=Dollar_sign
 * States: This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Dollar sign" with links to GFDL at gnu.org and to original article
 * States: Copyright 2006 Sprinko.com Lassitter Ent, Inc. Company - All Rights Reserved
 * Note: Somewhat hilariously replaces every occurence of the string "Wikipedia" with "Sprinko Encyclopedia". Example: http://encyclopedia.sprinko.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia

Notification sent. Had to keep it brief to fit their 500 character feedback form. decltype (talk) 14:20, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Star Trek: USS Scorpion

 * Site: Star Trek: USS Scorpion
 * The page known allies combines material from various Wikipedia pages, possibly with other text included as well.
 * No mention of Wikipedia
 * No mention of the GNU/FDL


 * Sent out standard compliance request email. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry 23:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Received one back - he's not aware of where the text is copied from - doesn't believe it is copied. I've supplied him with examples, but I might need to delve into the historical revisions. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry 02:32, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed, I think. He's emailed back promising changes. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry 03:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Start learning now

 * Site: http://www.startlearningnow.com/
 * Although they mention Wikipedia and the GNU/FDL on [this page] They don't make it obvious from article pages that the content is under the FDL.
 * Example, |Bloomington.htm Bloomington, Indiana has no mention of Wikipedia, although its obvious that is where the content came from.
 * Bloomington example (and others) now mentions Wikipedia, with links to Wikipedia XML and original page plus to GFDL at gnu.org. Page ends with "©2003-2005 All rights reserved, Start Learning Now."--Henrygb 02:14, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Start surfing
List of backronyms is an article to which I'd contributed years ago; the original has long-since been deleted. If someone wants to preserve this stuff, great, but some attribution would be in order please? --carlb (talk) 17:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

encyclopedia.stateuniversity . com
I see "stateuniversity . com" is globally blacklisted at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Spam_blacklist. I am adding this entry here as they look to me like an extensive collection of copyright violating wikipedia-derived content. No attributions, no GFDL, and they claim, obscurely, that content is copyright "Net Industries" and obtained from a printed, unnamed, source. Examples are everywhere. http://encyclopedia.stateuniversity.com/pages/21768/Ted-Turner.html and wikipedia's article on Ted Turner are obviously connected.

Until this entry, neither stateuniversity. com nor "Net Industries", nor "Cambridge Encyclopedia" were listed in Mirrors and forks.See also http://encyclopedia.stateuniversity.com/collection/1/Cambridge-Encyclopedia.html. "Cambridge Encyclopedia" has a lot of obvious copyvio'ed biographies. 84user (talk) 14:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

stateuniversity. com's copyright page claims they will responds to takedown notices:

"Intellectual Property

It is the policy of StateUniversity.com to respond expeditiously to claims of intellectual property infringement. StateUniversity.com will promptly process and investigate notices of alleged infringement and will take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If there is any link or material in any page on this site that would infringe on any copyright, the link or material, provided it is being served from StateUniversity.com's server rather than that of a third party, will be removed immediately upon proof or appropriate demonstration of controlling interest or ownership. Any names that appear in this site may be trademarks/service marks/registered trademarks or copyrighted materials and are therefore the property of their respective owners."

84user (talk) 14:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * At least on this page, they acknowledge Wikipedia, but they don't conform to the license. - Jmabel | Talk 19:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

StudyCrime.com

 * Site: StudyCrime.com
 * Sample article: Amphetamine, US Copyright Law
 * no mention of Wikipedia
 * no mention of GFDL

sthweb.bu.edu

 * Site:

Subnetworking.com

 * Site: subnetworking.com
 * Contains many articles that appear to be verbatim copies of articles, minus images and some tables.
 * No mention of Wikipedia.
 * No mention of GFDL
 * The site says under every page: MyAdvertisers.Com - Copyright © 2005 - All Rights Reserved

Sunny population

 * Site: www.sunnypopulation.net
 * Example: www.sunnypopulation.net/w/index.php?title=London
 * States "This is an extract from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia" with link to www.wikipedia.org
 * No obvious mention of or link to GFDL
 * No obvious link to original article

Supercrawler

 * Site: www.supercrawler.com
 * Example: www.supercrawler.com/Facts/thomas_johnson__designer_.html
 * Link near top to original article (under "See live article")
 * States "This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License" with links to Wikipedia and to local article about GFDL which in turn has link to GFDL text at gnu.org

Susan's Place Transgender Wiki

 * Site: wiki.susans.org
 * Sample article: http://wiki.susans.org/index.php/Feminism
 * Contains text from various articles, mostly modified.
 * Most (or all?) pages with Wikipedia information say *Some information provided in whole or in part by http://en.wikipedia.org/
 * Content licensed under GFDL 1.2
 * Software: MediaWiki

swisscorner.com

 * Site: www.swisscorner.com/
 * Example: www.swisscorner.com/wiki.php?title=User_talk:Eugene-elgato

t-st.de

 * Site: wikipedia.t-st.de
 * Copy of the German Wikipedia
 * Use the Wiki-text as their source, as can be seen when their wiki-to-HTML translation does not work (e.g. in tables)
 * Links to local copy of the GNU/FDL article, which links to GNU/FDL at gnu.org
 * Keeps "aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie"
 * Links to article & German main page

TaxGloss

 * Site: http://www.taxgloss.com/
 * Example: from Albania
 * Article ends with "Provided by Wikipedia.org", with link to Wikipedia, and "All Rights Reserved TAXGLOSS.COM"
 * No mention of GFDL
 * No link to original article
 * As of 23:22, 10 December 2005 (UTC) --Henrygb

Teachersparadise.com

 * Site: www.TeachersParadise.com
 * Example: http://www.teachersparadise.com/ency/en/wikipedia/e/ed/edmund_barton.html
 * Mentions GFDL
 * No mention of Wikipedia
 * Their "edit this page" button links back to Wikipedia's edit page form.
 * Listed here - August 10, 2004. &rarr;Raul654 21:06, Aug 10, 2004 (UTC)

techno-science

 * Site: www.techno-science.net in French
 * Example: www.techno-science.net/?onglet=glossaire&definition=4865 from fr:Factorielle, largely a translation of English Factorial
 * States: "Cette définition provient de l'encyclopédie libre Wikipédia publiée sous licence GNU FDL, elle est reprise sur techno-science.net à but informatif. Vous pouvez soumettre une modification ou un complément à cette définition sur la page correspondante de Wikipédia. La liste complète des auteurs de cet article est disponible sur cette page. Il est possible que certains problèmes de mise en forme demeurent suite à l'importation de cette page, dans de tels cas veuillez vous reporter à la version originale sur Wikipédia."
 * Links to original article and history
 * Link to GFDL at gnu.org
 * As at 00:06, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

TheBestLinks.com

 * Site: www.TheBestLinks.com
 * Description of the site: uses modified MediaWiki software to serve up an unmodified current-version English Wikipedia article database. The visual appearance is slightly different and a bar near the top lists some of the first few links in the article. They have added some special pages for popular pages, new pages, and a "quick index", and have added them to the sidebar. They have also added the ability to add links and discussion to the bottom of articles (blog-style).
 * This mirror I would say is noncompliant. The GFDL is linked, but there is no indication whatsoever that it's Wikipedia material, much less a link to Wikipedia or the article. The authors therefore receive no credit. The creating company's contact is info AT innovateit.com, but I have not contacted them. Deco 19:27, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * They mirror everything! Down to the User space!   Hell, they have a mirror of this discussion.   -- AllyUnion (talk) 07:43, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * They are certainly spammer fighting for some pageranks more. They put advertisement in the front of the text. But they do state (in tiny letter) that it is a Gnu document and then back link to wikimedia (not wikipedia)--Alexandre Van de Sande 13:43, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * And the last update was september 2004 :( &mdash; Ilyan  e  p  (Talk)  18:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Scratch that, but it definately hasn't been updated recently (my userpage on their site still features my long deleted picture) &mdash; Ilyan  e  p  (Talk)  18:31, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

TheFreeDictionary.com

 * Just visited FreeDictionary via !, specifically article (disambig. pg?) ITS. Credited en.Wp, stated GNU license, but included "©2012 Farlex, Inc."  Is this correct?  It's my understanding of free-use and share-alike, that each "publisher," in turn, allows free use also, or what is the point of the licensing.  Can they claim a copyright of info they obtained under either system?  I hope you are still active here.  I haven't been able to send this info to WM, so I'm going to cc your Talkpage.
 * Rags,69.171.178.79 (talk) 21:57, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

thefreeencyclopedia.com

 * Site: www.thefreeencyclopedia.com
 * Example: http://www.thefreeencyclopedia.com/definition/word.aspx?w=Bro%27Town from Bro'Town
 * Link to original article in Wikipedia
 * attributes the article to Wikipedia
 * Mentions GFDL, provides link, but also says "Copyright © 2005 TheFreeEncyclopedia.com"
 * The link, attribution and GFDL license are not clearly visible
 * i.e. in a very light grey small font, and uses graphics (the GDFL text is rendered as an image, making it invisible to text-only browsers and search engines.) and nofollow links

The Pedia

 * Site: thepedia.com
 * Mirrors all content into it's own site, with the addition of computer-generated "summaries" at the tops of articles.
 * Seems relatively new - search box isn't even a search box, just a place-holder image.
 * NOT compliant: No mention of GFDL, no mention of Wikipedia (except on the text of the mirrored main page) and says "Copyright (c) 2005 ThePedia.com, All rights Reserved
 * Owner contacted and site is now compliant. &mdash; Asbestos | Talk  15:37, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Contact details from WhoIs: Registrant/Administrator: Roger Lichfield, admin AT dmbc.com
 * Listed here July 13, 2005, &mdash; Asbestos | Talk  10:30, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
 * No history section listing authors and dates.
 * Medium compliance.

Therfcc

 * Site: Therfcc.org
 * Example:
 * Large amounts of Wikipedia content
 * Acknowledges GNU/FDL
 * Mentions Wikipedia, but no link to main page or individual articles.

theskyiscrape

 * Site: http://www.theskyiscrape.com
 * Example: http://www.theskyiscrape.com/index.php?option=com_awiki&view=mediawiki&Itemid=148&article=File:Greek_cross.svg

thesopranos.com
see Mirrors_and_forks/Stu

Thinkdogs.com
See Mirrors_and_forks/Vwxyz

thinkingaustralia.com

 * Site: http://www.thinkingaustralia.com/thinking_australia/wikipedia/default.php
 * Example:
 * High compliance.


 * Seems to have copied all Wikipedia content including user pages.
 * Mentions Wikipedia but not the GFDL nor the original article.
 * Thumbnails are from Wikimedia (they have no local copy)!
 * First letter sent by Wj32
 * Got reply, they've complied except for the link back. Sent response. --wj32 talk 11:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Got another reply, they've fully complied. --wj32 talk 10:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * hmm are they mirroring live by any chance?Geni 10:23, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

tickerdvd.com

 * Site www.tickerdvd.com
 * Example: http://www.tickerdvd.com/articles/Sony_HiFD

More research requested

Tiosam.com

 * Site: http://www.tiosam.com/enciclopedia/enciclopedia.php
 * Sample article: http://www.tiosam.com/enciclopedia/enciclopedia.php?title=L%C3%ADngua_portuguesa
 * Info
 * No edit link
 * Mentions GFDL
 * Aks people that use the content to link back to their site.
 * Link (in english, the content is all in portuguese) to www.wikipedia.org
 * Articles are cached copies extracted from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
 * does't have the article history
 * Has the users pages (access by address bar, like: )
 * Software: Don't know the software they are using, but if it is MediaWiki, they don't have the banner.
 * Listed here: 17:14, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC), Get It

TimesDaily (Alabama)

 * Site: www.timesdaily.com
 * Example: www.timesdaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=NEWS&template=wiki&text=Cliff_Richard
 * States at end: "Wikipedia information about Cliff_Richard This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. More from Wikipedia" with links to GFDL at gnu.org and to en:Wikipedia main page
 * No obvious link to original article under top mention of Wikipedia
 * Page ends "© Copyright 2007 TimesDaily. All Rights Reserved."

ToCatch.info
Putting them in LOW. We need to send them a complaint letter. Bandwidth stealing is not acceptable. JesseW 21:26, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Site: ToCatch.info
 * Example: http://www.tocatch.info/en/Ibn_Al-Zubayr.htm
 * Link to GNU FDL (local copy). JesseW 21:26, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * DOES NOT link to Wikipedia article. (It does, but it does it with Javascript, which hides it from search engines. Not acceptable. JesseW 21:26, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * DOES NOT mention Wikipedia. (Again, does so only in javascript.) JesseW 21:26, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * STEALS image bandwidth. (See source for http://www.tocatch.info/en/Ibn_Al-Zubayr.htm, redirect image)

Tony Levin
Article history shows content back at least as far as 2007, whereas the domain was registered in 2009 with the same content – so no question of who was first. The website has a "get involved" page, which asks readers if they have any relevant "content that [they] would like to contribute to the site" – this maybe the source of the duplicate content. This issue must, however, be dealt with correctly. At the time of writing, there are reports that the subject of this biography has died and we must treat this with respect. matt (talk) 19:26, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

TopArticle.com

 * Site: TopArticle.com
 * Link to GNU FDL.
 * Link to Wikipedia homepage via "Help build the worlds largest free encyclopedia"
 * No link to original article.
 * Says the content is from Wikipedia.

Top40-Charts

 * Site: top40-charts.com or www.top40-charts.info
 * Example 1: top40-charts.com/artists/biography.php?aid=1595
 * No obvious mention of Wikipedia
 * No obvious mention of GFDL
 * Page ends "© 2001-7 top40-charts.com"
 * Example 2: www.top40-charts.info/?title=Cliff_Richard
 * Page ends "This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article Cliff Richard; it is used under the GNU Free Documentation License. You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the GFDL." with links to original article and to local copy of WP:GFDL

topliterature

 * Site: encyclopedia.topliterature.com
 * Example: encyclopedia.topliterature.com/?title=Dollar_sign
 * States: This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article ( Dollar_sign ); it is used under the GNU Free Documentation License
 * Links to Wikipedia and original article, and to GFDL at gnu.org

totalbike.com/wiki

 * Site: totalbike.com/wiki
 * No GNU FDL
 * Not mentioning wikipedia at all
 * Does not appear to still exist. -- Arwel (talk) 23:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Trip Atlas

 * Article ends "This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source" with links to Wikipedia and to original article. 02:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Page ends "©2011 TripAtlas.com" 02:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

travel.mysic.org
More research requested
 * Site: travel.mysic.org
 * Example: http://travel.mysic.org/Process_theology

tscholars.com

 * Site: http://www.tscholars.com/encyclopedia/
 * Mentions Wikipedia and GFDL.
 * Links to the original article.
 * As of 13:45, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

twgold.com
See Mirrors_and_forks/Vwxyz

TvWiki
TheJC TalkContributions 13:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Database seems to be broken, but still appearing in Google searches --Rumping (talk) 11:22, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

TypeEncyclopedia.com

 * Site: TypeEncyclopedia.com
 * There is a mention of the GNU FDL
 * Link to our copyright page (I guess that's OK)
 * Link to our Main Page
 * No link to individual article
 * Example:http://www.typeencyclopedia.com/ency_help.asp?t=Dolly_the_sheep
 * Contact: webmaster AT typenetwork.com
 * I emailed them. --mav 11:46, 4 Jan 2004 (UTC)
 * Opps! They are in full compliance after all (link to individula articles is under "This article"). --mav 14:07, 4 Jan 2004 (UTC)

TYPEsyria.com
(bizarrely, they have a copy of our Jordan disambiguation page! Amongst other content.)
 * Site: TYPEsyria.com
 * no link to article
 * no link to GFDL. Standard letter sent by: MB 08:01 13 Jul 2003 (UTC)
 * no response received as of Jul 18. Will contact via domain name administrative contact arasa AT emirates.net.ae.  Does anyone know what country .ae is?  Does anyone know of a translator program, or know the language of this country?  MB
 * Sounds like United Arab Emirates. Guessing from their location, I'm guessing they speak Arabic (perhaps a different dialect, but I doubt it), like all the other countries around there.  There should be a lot of English too.  dave
 * .ae is the United Arab Emirates, and the main languages include Arabic, English, Persian, Hindi, and Urdu.
 * Looks like typesyria is down, but typenetwork.com still has several coppies of Wikipedia, including almost the entire site typeencyclopedia.com. It uses a very old, outdated version of Wikipedia. LDan 04:09, 19 Oct 2003 (UTC)
 * Still 404. Patstuarttalk·edits 05:28, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Type United Kingdom

 * Site: www.TypeUnitedKingdom.com
 * No link to original wikipedia article
 * No GFDL link
 * standard letter sent by LDan
 * The same network as typesyria.
 * Wikipedia printable version


 * Links to current Wikipedia article, but not at the stable URL (not a clickable link either)
 * No GFDL link
 * I think we should send the developers the standard letter - I already submitted a feature request and mentioned this issue on their mailing list; no response whatsoever. It is very important that the printable version is OK per our copyright since that is a nice clean HTML copy of an article. --mav 10:46, 31 Jul 2003 (UTC)
 * Works now. :) Martin 14:27, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC)
 * What does this mean? +sj+ 16:20, 2004 Mar 28 (UTC)
 * Site is 404. Patstuarttalk·edits 05:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Unification Encyclopedia Project

 * Site: http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/
 * Project vision
 * Sample articles
 * Mentions GNU/FDL, and links to GNU/FDL at gnu.org
 * Acknowledges Wikipedia with gratitude and praise
 * Links to the exact version of the article page copied and to its revision history
 * Uses American English
 * Technical consultant is Wikipedia old-timer Ed Poor
 * Compliance: HIGH
 * Project name changed to New World Encyclopedia

unidentifieduniverse.com
https://unidentifieduniverse.com/2015/10/25/raining-diamonds/ copies an old version of Diamonds on Jupiter and Saturn without attribution. Attempted to leave a comment on the blog on 11 May 2016. --Beland (talk) 17:56, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Unipedia.info

 * Site: Unipedia
 * Sample article: Albania - http://www.unipedia.info/Albania.html
 * Mentions GNU/FDL, and links to GNU/FDL at gnu.org
 * Mentions Wikipedia, but no obvious link
 * Does not link to article page
 * Also a German version
 * Some strange Wikipedia administration pages when some references but not all changed to Unipedia.
 * Also user pages... Really annoying.
 * As of 09:31, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

US Bazaar

 * Site: http://www.us-bazaar.com/
 * Example: from Albania
 * Top right has Creative Commons "Some rights reserved" linking to GFDL at gnu.org
 * Bottom has disclaimer including "US Bazaar.com Encyclopedia content is provided by Wikipedia. US Bazaar.com is not responsible for the content and shall not be liable for any errors in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All content is under a GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and may be copied and distributed under that same license in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially, provided that the License, the copyright notices, and the license notice saying the License applies to the Document are reproduced in all copies, and that you add no other conditions whatsoever to those of the License."
 * No obvious links to Wikipedia or original article
 * As of 02:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC) --Henrygb

Userpedia.com

 * Site: Userpedia - موسوعة المستخدم
 * Description: Started by a Arabic Wikipedia user as a full dump of Arabic Wikipedia, and claims to aim to incorporate articles from different sources. Some Wikipedia contributers edit articles for it.
 * Mentions GNU FDL license and links to a local copy of it.
 * Owner refuses to aknowledge Wikipedia (ar:%D9%86%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B4_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%AF%D9%85:%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87, ar:%D9%86%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B4_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%AE%D8%AF%D9%85:Oxydo).
 * Sample articles: ar:أنباط -> http://www.userpedia.com/index.php/%D8%A3%D9%86%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B7, and ar:طاهر الجمل -> http://www.userpedia.com/index.php/%D8%B7%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%85%D9%84
 * No longer exists.--Exarion 18:58, 24 June 2007 (UTC)