Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/AIM slang userboxes

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. Stupid but harmless. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:User AIM-0

 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)

A series of related userboxes regarding slang about a decade and a half out of date, that never seemed to see much use even when they were relevant. Unlikely to suddenly get an uptick in use. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 13:04, 13 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep all - It may not get an uptick in usage but AIM-0 is transcluded in 110 pages. Similar for all the other templates, They all have non-tricial usage.  -- Whpq (talk) 19:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep all - Non-trivial usage and, though dated, conveys information about a form of communication (the seemingly utmost traditional use of a userbox here). Though perhaps less useful and more whimsical by the day, they are utterly harmless. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 09:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.