Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:3D terms

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:06, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Book:3D terms
Two articles is not a book. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:33, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Userfy I agree, but I think that this should just be moved to the person who made it's userspace.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 18:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Why? They haven't edited since February and already have a more complete version in their user space at User:Jreynaga/Books/3D Graphics Terms. --B (talk) 19:43, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * So,delete is better. --Extra 999 (Contact me +  contribs) 11:31, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Well technically, it could be a book, but this is just crap so delete. The deletion summary should however reflect that recreation is not discouraged. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:17, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Seeing all of the comments thaty ou all posted, I now realize that I should switch to Delete. Persistent bunch, aren't you? ;)  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 05:14, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for now. Far better sandboxed book is already in userspace.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:23, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.