Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:Chemistry Book




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was redirect. @harej 00:12, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Book:Chemistry Book
Delete or redirect. Book:Chemistry is a superior book which completely overlaps with this one. Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 00:43, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete (per nom) to avoid the extra step of RfD. –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 01:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You mean to argue that a search for "Book:Chemistry Book" should take you to Special:Search and not to Book:Chemistry? Why?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Any search for "Book:{Topic} Book" will bring up "Book:{Topic}" as the first search result (see e.g., "Astronomy Book", "Biology Book", "Physics Book"), so not having a redirect will not prevent users from finding their desired page. A quick glance at traffic statistics for titles of the form "Book:{Topic} Book" shows that they are not searched (e.g., "Astronomy Book", "Biology Book", "Physics Book"); even the page that is the focus of this nomination saw virtually no traffic until it was nominated for deletion. –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 09:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Black Falcon's strong arguments above. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 19:25, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.