Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:NEUROSCIENCE

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was redirect to Book:Neuroscience. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:16, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Book:NEUROSCIENCE


Redundant to Book:Neuroscience, which is also older and has an image. I would propose to copy the links from this page and use them instead of the links on Book:Neuroscience, because here the links are ordered in subsections.
 * Delete per nom. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 15:51, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Why not merge and then delete the resulting redirect? bd2412  T 18:05, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * That is more or less the same as I proposed, when suggesting to "copy the link". Debresser (talk) 18:43, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm a stickler for preserving attribution history. Cheers! bd2412  T 19:04, 23 November 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.