Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:Operation Rainfall

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus. ‑Scottywong | talk _ 06:15, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Book:Operation Rainfall


This is too small in scope for a book. Even the meager three articles listed besides the main one are barely relevant to the subject. Geolodus (talk) 13:19, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Userfy. Books are cheap in the userspace. &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 14:27, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - Aren't books broken? Robert McClenon (talk) 22:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Depends what you mean by that. Book creator is still up (somehow). They also work in the sense that you can buy a physical copy of the book. What doesn't work is PDF rendering (link) which is in re-development with PediaPress. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 00:59, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Is that a reason to delete them? Geolodus (talk) 05:27, 8 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep there's no such thing as 'too small in scope'. It's a topic, it's legit, no reason to delete. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:52, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.