Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:People

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete - nobody feels this is worth keeping. Wily D 08:11, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Book:People


scope is impossibly large, this list of articles doesnt even begin to cover the title's subject. Community book subjects have to have some reasonably limited subject, and our core 10 or core 100 topics will always be too large. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Books should provide some unique set of related articles. Starting at such a high level makes it impossible to adequately define what should and should not be included here. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:51, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. per above. -- Klein zach  05:45, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Agree with nom. Doesn't this lock in a specific preferred collection of articles?  Who originally and still thinks Books are a good idea?  Who decides whether these books are maintained?  Or maintained well?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:45, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.