Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:Pinoy Telenovelas Winter 2008-2009




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. JohnCD (talk) 11:37, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Book:Pinoy Telenovelas Winter 2008-2009
This is an underpopulated book about the topic of "Philippine telenovelas on air during the winter of 2008–09", where winter is presumably defined from the perspective of those of us in the Northern Hemisphere, where the Philippines is located.

If my understanding of the the topic and scope of the book is correct, then I believe that this book does not meet the standards for a community book because its topic is too narrow in light of the quantity and quality of content about the subject that is available on Wikipedia. There appears to be enough material available for a book about the topic of Philippine drama in general (see also Category:Philippine drama), but not for a book about Philippine drama during a particular three-month period.

Normally, I would suggest userfying and converting to a user book, but in this case the creator is indef-blocked. So, delete. -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:35, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Nomination logic is sound, although userfying would also be an acceptable solution. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 07:02, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete or userfy, per nom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SmokingNewton (talk • contribs) 13:26, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Userfy. WP:PRESERVE can be applied to books, too. Samwb123T (R)-C-E 22:27, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I guess it can, but the full extent of information which can be preserved in this case is three links. Also, to whose userspace do you suggest that the page be userfied (the creator is indef-blocked)? Thanks, -- Black Falcon (talk) 22:47, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.