Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:Pokémon: The one for Pokémon news




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Tim Song (talk) 14:45, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Book:Pokémon: The one for Pokémon news
A user recently created the long titled version (originally Books/Pokemon). I notice there is a lot of duplication (100%?) with Book:Pokémon so I wonder what is the best option here. Does this books have a different-enough scope to stay, or should it be merged/redirect with Book:Pokémon? Right now I'm leaning towards merging and redirecting to Book:Pokémon. WP Pokémon and the creator contacted. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 06:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Definitely merge (or just AfD). It does not look like the author has a clear scope in mind. It is either a duplication of existing entries or irrelevant ones, such as Game Boy articles or Experience point. — H3llkn0wz ▎talk 13:39, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - The "one for Pokemon news" doesn't make any sense. It doesn't even have the newest games, HeartGold and SoulSilver, and Black and White. I say just outright delete it. It serves no purpose, and is not even a good search term. Blake (Talk·Edits) 14:28, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * K, well I'll send to MfD so things are a bit more formal. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 19:28, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

-
 * The above was copy-pasted from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 19:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * As my post was copied, confirming my delete support. — H3llkn0wz ▎talk 19:43, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

You could still use the one for pokemon news at the other book Hyperstar (talk) 15:20, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Philip1992
 * A book for news doesn't make any sense. We already have news on the portal. Books just don't seem like the place for news. Although, I don't know much about them, I am pretty sure they are about bringing together articles that are important to the subject for readers to have all in one list. Blake (Talk·Edits) 18:37, 19 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Doesn't make sense in book space, nothing salvageable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 04:34, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Some of that stuff is only tangentially related to Pokémon, and there's not even news in there like the title suggests. Reach Out to the Truth 17:10, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.