Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:The Legacy

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  keep. JohnCD (talk) 10:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Book:The Legacy
Only four articles —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:12, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment are you sure that justifies deletion?  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 05:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Someone will say "Hey! What are you doing?" if not, hopefully. :P  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 05:44, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Too small.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 05:44, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as the partner to Featured topics/The Legacy. Current practice at WP:FT is to have a matching book for each good or featured topic. Incidentally, is there any guideline or rule as to how many articles ought to be in a book as a minimum, or is it purely personal preference? (Suggestion: check "what links here" before nominating something for deletion, you may be surprised at what you find...) BencherliteTalk 05:49, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Bencherlite -MBK004 05:59, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep There's only four articles? So what? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 10:00, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Headbomb. --Extra 999 (Contact me +  contribs) 11:05, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.