Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Cynthia Jones sandbox abuse




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. harej 00:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Cynthia Jones sandbox abuse
here are the pages in question Either its abuse of the system, or WP:NOTWEBHOST or they are test pages that haven't been used in years in any event I don't see any reason for any of them andyzweb (talk) 09:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * User talk:Cynthia Jones/mysandbox0
 * User talk:Cynthia Jones/mysandbox1
 * User talk:Cynthia Jones/mysandbox2
 * User talk:Cynthia Jones/mysandbox3
 * User talk:Cynthia Jones/mysandbox4
 * User talk:Cynthia Jones/mysandbox5
 * User talk:Cynthia Jones/mysandbox6
 * User talk:Cynthia Jones/mysandbox7
 * User talk:Cynthia Jones/mysandbox8
 * User talk:Cynthia Jones/mysandbox9
 * Delete as "secret pages" At least it sure looks lik have had in the past.  Collect (talk) 14:55, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think they might even be copies of each other, and obviously none of the pages have encyclopedic content, so as per the user page guideline's section on non-encyclopedic content, delete. JulieSpaulding (talk) 06:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.