Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Dillon zumwalt




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. Note that Miscellany for deletion doesn't handle article deletions. Hut 8.5 19:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Dillon zumwalt
not a useful entry --Steelerdon (talk) 17:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

I don't think they do these types of articles this way, but true, not useful at all.Jessica Gordon (talk) 17:12, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

You're right. I'm an FNG, it looks like the db-person template has now been properly applied. (Steelerdon (talk) 17:19, 14 September 2009 (UTC))

I didn't know about that template so some good has come out of it for both of us.Jessica Gordon (talk) 17:22, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Not the right place to nominate, this is for Userpages and everything else. Also Steelerdon your argument could of been taken as Wp:IDONTLIKEIT.-- SKATER  Speak. 18:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Before nominating anything for deletion please take time to read WP:CSD and then form there all the articles related to deletion. It would save us all time. This article in particular is at least a clear "test page" under CSD, but might fall under other criteria. Could someone speedy close this, and delete the article? Pretty Please?--Cerejota (talk) 19:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.