Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:"Maestro" Claudio Bergamin

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:"Maestro" Claudio Bergamin

 * &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:32, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:32, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Many declined submissions to AfC. Kill off to stop wasting time. Legacypac (talk) 09:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep the editor appears to be making good-faith attempts to improve the article prior to each resubmission. Everyone was new once, as discussed at WP:BITE. VQuakr (talk) 08:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:32, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pornography-related deletion discussions. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 18:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Ghastly quality is not a reason to delete nonstale drafts, absent fatal policy violations. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 19:13, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep declined submissions are not a valid reason to delete a draft, "stale" or not. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 04:58, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.