Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:'Timi Adigun

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. No consensus to delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:17, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:'Timi Adigun

 * Winged Blades Godric 16:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Winged Blades Godric 16:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Unremarkable pastor. Page has no sources. Maybe suitable on the user's page if written about the creator. Legacypac (talk) 03:28, 12 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  16:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC) keep Nothing in the nom gives a valid reason for deletion. This would be a plausible nom in article space, but there a WP:BEFORE search would be conducted. While nothing in the article demonstrates notability, no one knows what might be out there, unless someone has in fact done a serious BEFORE-type search. Therefore "Unremarkable" does not apply, because we don't know that. Sources are not required in draft space. Nor is demonstrated notability. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 00:15, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure which Wikipedia you are part of where absolutely hopeless drafts should be retained forever. If you want to mainspace the topic go ahead, but this page has been abandoned with no sources and no claim to notability. Who will inprove it? Is the information Verifiable? Should it be mirrored across the web?  Legacypac (talk) 02:19, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I am part of the Wikipedia where the policies take account of which namespace one is in, and where drafts should not be deleted for lack of sources. Also where drafts are not deleted because the subject is "Unremarkable" unless a very through WP:BEFORE-type search has been done to get some assurance that thee are not, in fact, sources avaialble which have not yet been included in the article. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 21:33, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.