Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:शिवम झा(उन्मत्ताधीश)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 21:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft:शिवम झा(उन्मत्ताधीश)

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Per WP:NOTFREEWEBHOST. Personal musings by a non-contributor. Kleuske (talk) 13:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - The machine translation from Hindi is almost as incomprehensible as the original. However, this is an unsubmitted draft.  Unsubmitted drafts should be ignored, and will be deleted in six months, or should be declined or rejected when submitted.  Leave this alone and it will go away in August.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Since it's been brought here, but I echo the above that this is a waste of time. A week long MFD discussion is going to take significantly more editor time than this is worth and it should have been left for G13. That being said since this has 0 chance of ever becoming an article since it is fundamentally at odds with WP:What wikipedia is not and is written in the wrong language, and leaving this for 6 months so it can be deleted under a different process is just pointless bureaucracy. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 17:28, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * weak Keep. I don't bother deleting unsubmitted drafts unless that fall into G11 or G3, and I do rescue some articles from them at 6 months. Not that I can rescue this, but we shouldn't bother removing them.  DGG ( talk ) 02:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per our anonymous friend. I don't think we should nominate things like this at MfD, but in the specific case of NOT violations I'm inclined to support a deletion if it does land here. Keeping and resetting the deletion clock is more bureaucratic than I'm inclined to support, even if it should be made clear MfD isn't a catchall bad-draft-trap. Vaticidalprophet 06:15, 12 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete, though this didn't need MfD and in my opinion this is why we need a WP:DRAFTPROD. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 00:39, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.