Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:10,001 (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. Salvio giuliano 18:51, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Draft:10,001

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

This draft doesn't appear salvageable. The initial AfC submission was declined as a non-notable topic, and the bulk of it is sourced to an unreliable pseudoscience website. - Who is John Galt? ✉ 15:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NDRAFT. Especially seeing how the author is indeffed, MfD is not needed and this will be resolved in the natural course of things. —Alalch E. 16:48, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - This draft needs rejecting. Its author needed blocking.  We don't routinely delete useless stuff from draft space.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:42, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: No reason for deletion. Busywork.  SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.