Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:10 top scenic countries

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:10 top scenic countries


Non-G13 eligible draft from June 2014 with a table. Possibly just a user test. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:07, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete top 10 according to who? Obviously Canada should be #1 Legacypac (talk) 02:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Just blank. AfC / DraftSpace needs some process to deal with trivial things, a process that doesn't involve MfD.  These worthless harmless pages do not need to be deleted.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:19, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If you don't like MfD do something else. No one is forcing you to loom at or vote on these nominations. Legacypac (talk) 17:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Reviewing for insults to productive Wikipedians is something I think is important to do. This nomination is not that, but there is no reason to delete rather than blank, so it makes the important job harder. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:30, 5 March 2016 (UTC). A review and discussion about basically nothing is exactly right. The nom is supplying us with Busywork, as revealed on examination --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete – WP:STALEDRAFT with very little content that has not been edited since June 2014. North America1000 17:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Basically nothing here. SwisterTwister   talk  05:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.