Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:129 Emerald Hill Road

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Keep. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:129 Emerald Hill Road


This subject is not notable. In order for a demolished house to be notable, there needs to be published history about something that happened at the house, or the site needs to be a historic landmark. Then of course, there would have to be publications that document this. CatSleepingOnTheKeyboard 03:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep for now, no prejudice against renomination in the future. Draftspace pages are not necessarily rushed out the door right away for being inadequate; the whole point of draftspace is that creators are given time and feedback to at least try to get it up to articlespace standards. This is not a promotable draft right now, obviously, but it is possible that a stronger notability claim, and the reliable sources needed to support it, may exist — so it should be given a reasonable chance to develop, and then relisted for deletion if it's still not adequate by the fall. Bearcat (talk) 15:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.