Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:1672938 (Number)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. ✗ plicit  13:06, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:1672938 (Number)

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Not a "notable" number as compared to others in Category:Integers -- Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 11:00, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Indeed not. Just delete. --Bduke (talk) 11:06, 9 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete This doesn't need an article. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 15:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity, and there's no evidence of tendentiousness or foundational policy violations. It's perfectly harmless: allow it to die a peaceful death via G13. While I don't doubt that this number isn't notable, MfD isn't AfD lite. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:06, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity. Draftspace exists to contain unbounded stuff. Bringing it to mfd is a net negative.  SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:02, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a draft, and drafts aren't checked for notability.Jackattack1597 (talk) 11:46, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep and Reject. The nominator has the good-faith mistaken idea that drafts should be deleted for notability reasons.  They should be declined or rejected for notability reasons.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:19, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NMFD. This is not a venue to debate notability. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 14:12, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.