Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:1955 Singapore Harbour Board Staff Association strike

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Not encyclopedically written but topic not necessarily inappropriate for WP. Creator is welcome to trim, anyone else might pull something useful out of it...eh. Let it die a G13 if no one touches it. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:41, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:1955 Singapore Harbour Board Staff Association strike

 * &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Class assignment essay content. Legacypac (talk) 00:27, 14 June 2017 (UTC) I have edited my draft and resubmitted after each comment from a reviewer.

However if you wished to delete my draft there is nothing I can do about it. I will respect the decision of wikipedia. I would also not attempt to contribute to wikipedia in future.

The below sites were published despite errors, issues with pro-leftist tones and essay tones.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hock_Lee_bus_riots https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1954_National_Service_riots

Reginazhou2017 (talk) 04:10, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank-you for posting. No one is saying not to contribute. This page was just caught up in some housekeeping of drafts that don't appear to meet Wikipedia standards for various reasons. The best way to get comfortable at Wikipedia is to contribute to existing pages before attempting a new page. 80% of new pages by inexperienced editors get deleted but 80% of new pages by experienced editors stay undeleted. Creating a new page successfully is one of the tougher things to do here. I'll take a look at two pages you linked. The existence of problematic content elsewhere does not justify adding to the problem. Legacypac (talk) 06:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.